Arbeitspapier
"One man's meat is another man's poison": An experimental study of voluntarily providing public projects that raise mixed feelings
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Erschienen in
-
Series: Jena economic research papers; No. 2011,034
Bezug (was)
Wirtschaft
Noncooperative Games
Design of Experiments: Laboratory, Group Behavior
Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
Publicly Provided Goods: Mixed Markets
public project
bidding behavior
procedural fairness
Öffentliches Gut
Auktionstheorie
Gerechtigkeit
Emotion
Test
Noncooperative Games
Design of Experiments: Laboratory, Group Behavior
Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
Publicly Provided Goods: Mixed Markets
public project
bidding behavior
procedural fairness
Öffentliches Gut
Auktionstheorie
Gerechtigkeit
Emotion
Test
Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
Güth, Werner
Koukoumelis, Anastasios
Levati, M. Vittoria
Jena: Univ. [u.a.]
Koukoumelis, Anastasios
Levati, M. Vittoria
Jena: Univ. [u.a.]
Erschienen
Jena: Univ. [u.a.]
- Rechteinformation
-
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
18.10.2021, 08:57 MESZ
Objekttyp
- Arbeitspapier
Beteiligte
- Güth, Werner
- Koukoumelis, Anastasios
- Levati, M. Vittoria
- Jena: Univ. [u.a.]
Entstanden
- Jena: Univ. [u.a.]
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Public projects benefiting some and harming others: Three experimental studies
Rules (of bidding) to generate equal stated profits: An axiomatic approach
Providing negative cost public projects under a fair mechanism: An experimental analysis
Bargaining and negotiations: What should experimentalists explore more thoroughly?
Procedurally fair collective provision: Its requirements and experimental functionality
Collectively ranking candidates: An axiomatic approach
Procedurally Fair Collective Provision: Its Requirements and Experimental Functionality
Beyond procedural equity and reciprocity
Procedurally fair provision of public projects: An axiomatic characterization
Does procedural fairness crowd out other-regarding concerns? A bidding experiment
Making the world a better place: Experimental evidence from the generosity game
Ranking alternatives by a fair bidding rule: A theoretical and experimental analysis
Public projects benefiting some and harming others: Three experimental studies
Rules (of bidding) to generate equal stated profits: An axiomatic approach
Providing negative cost public projects under a fair mechanism: An experimental analysis
Bargaining and negotiations: What should experimentalists explore more thoroughly?
Procedurally fair collective provision: Its requirements and experimental functionality
Collectively ranking candidates: An axiomatic approach
Procedurally Fair Collective Provision: Its Requirements and Experimental Functionality
Beyond procedural equity and reciprocity
Procedurally fair provision of public projects: An axiomatic characterization
Does procedural fairness crowd out other-regarding concerns? A bidding experiment
Making the world a better place: Experimental evidence from the generosity game
Ranking alternatives by a fair bidding rule: A theoretical and experimental analysis
Public projects benefiting some and harming others: Three experimental studies
Rules (of bidding) to generate equal stated profits: An axiomatic approach
Providing negative cost public projects under a fair mechanism: An experimental analysis
Bargaining and negotiations: What should experimentalists explore more thoroughly?
Procedurally fair collective provision: Its requirements and experimental functionality
Collectively ranking candidates: An axiomatic approach
Procedurally Fair Collective Provision: Its Requirements and Experimental Functionality
Beyond procedural equity and reciprocity
Procedurally fair provision of public projects: An axiomatic characterization
Does procedural fairness crowd out other-regarding concerns? A bidding experiment
Making the world a better place: Experimental evidence from the generosity game