Arbeitspapier

Collectively ranking candidates: An axiomatic approach

Different evaluators typically disagree how to rank different candidates since they care more or less for the various qualities of the candidates. It is assumed that all evaluators submit vector bids assigning a monetary bid for each possible rank order. The rules must specify for all possible vectors of such vector bids the collectively binding rank order of candidates and the payments for this bid vector and its implied rank order. Three axioms uniquely define the procedurally fair ranking rules. We finally discuss how our approach can be adjusted to situations where one wants to rank only acceptable candidates.

Sprache
Englisch

Erschienen in
Series: Jena Economic Research Papers ; No. 2011,020

Klassifikation
Wirtschaft
Game Theory and Bargaining Theory: General
Noncooperative Games
Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
Social Choice; Clubs; Committees; Associations
Thema
social ranking
fairness
fair game forms
objective equality
mechanism
design
committee decision making
Personalauswahl
Gruppenentscheidung
Nichtkooperatives Spiel
Gerechtigkeit
Mechanism Design
Test

Ereignis
Geistige Schöpfung
(wer)
Güth, Werner
Ereignis
Veröffentlichung
(wer)
Friedrich Schiller University Jena and Max Planck Institute of Economics
(wo)
Jena
(wann)
2011

Handle
Letzte Aktualisierung
10.03.2025, 11:42 MEZ

Datenpartner

Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.

Objekttyp

  • Arbeitspapier

Beteiligte

  • Güth, Werner
  • Friedrich Schiller University Jena and Max Planck Institute of Economics

Entstanden

  • 2011

Ähnliche Objekte (12)