Arbeitspapier
Ranking alternatives by a fair bidding rule: A theoretical and experimental analysis
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Erschienen in
-
Series: Jena economic research papers; No. 2012,005
Bezug (was)
Wirtschaft
Design of Experiments: Laboratory, Group Behavior
Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact
Social Choice; Clubs; Committees; Associations
bidding behavior
procedural fairness
voting paradox
Gruppenentscheidung
Ranking-Verfahren
Gerechtigkeit
Abstimmungsparadoxon
Test
Subvention
Steuer
Design of Experiments: Laboratory, Group Behavior
Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact
Social Choice; Clubs; Committees; Associations
bidding behavior
procedural fairness
voting paradox
Gruppenentscheidung
Ranking-Verfahren
Gerechtigkeit
Abstimmungsparadoxon
Test
Subvention
Steuer
Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
Güth, Werner
Levati, M. Vittoria
Montinari, Natalia
Jena: Univ. [u.a.]
Levati, M. Vittoria
Montinari, Natalia
Jena: Univ. [u.a.]
Erschienen
Jena: Univ. [u.a.]
- Rechteinformation
-
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
18.10.2021, 08:56 MESZ
Objekttyp
- Arbeitspapier
Beteiligte
- Güth, Werner
- Levati, M. Vittoria
- Montinari, Natalia
- Jena: Univ. [u.a.]
Entstanden
- Jena: Univ. [u.a.]
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Collectively ranking candidates: An axiomatic approach
Bargaining and negotiations: What should experimentalists explore more thoroughly?
Does procedural fairness crowd out other-regarding concerns? A bidding experiment
"One man's meat is another man's poison": An experimental study of voluntarily providing public projects that raise mixed feelings
Rules (of bidding) to generate equal stated profits: An axiomatic approach
The provision of public goods with positive group interdependencies
Provision of multilevel public goods through positive externalities: Experimental evidence
Whom to blame? An experiment of collective harming and punishing
Will you accept without knowing what? A Thuringian newspaper experiment of the Yes-No Game
Crossing the point of no return: A public goods experiment
Procedurally fair provision of public projects: An axiomatic characterization
Effects of exclusion on social preferences
Collectively ranking candidates: An axiomatic approach
Bargaining and negotiations: What should experimentalists explore more thoroughly?
Does procedural fairness crowd out other-regarding concerns? A bidding experiment
"One man's meat is another man's poison": An experimental study of voluntarily providing public projects that raise mixed feelings
Rules (of bidding) to generate equal stated profits: An axiomatic approach
The provision of public goods with positive group interdependencies
Provision of multilevel public goods through positive externalities: Experimental evidence
Whom to blame? An experiment of collective harming and punishing
Will you accept without knowing what? A Thuringian newspaper experiment of the Yes-No Game
Crossing the point of no return: A public goods experiment
Procedurally fair provision of public projects: An axiomatic characterization
Effects of exclusion on social preferences
Collectively ranking candidates: An axiomatic approach
Bargaining and negotiations: What should experimentalists explore more thoroughly?
Does procedural fairness crowd out other-regarding concerns? A bidding experiment
"One man's meat is another man's poison": An experimental study of voluntarily providing public projects that raise mixed feelings
Rules (of bidding) to generate equal stated profits: An axiomatic approach
The provision of public goods with positive group interdependencies
Provision of multilevel public goods through positive externalities: Experimental evidence
Whom to blame? An experiment of collective harming and punishing
Will you accept without knowing what? A Thuringian newspaper experiment of the Yes-No Game
Crossing the point of no return: A public goods experiment
Procedurally fair provision of public projects: An axiomatic characterization