Arbeitspapier
Strategy-proofness of stochastic assignment mechanisms
This paper compares two prominent stochastic assignment mechanisms in the laboratory: Random serial dictatorship (RSD) and top trading cycles with random endowments (TTC). In standard theory, both mechanisms are strategy-proof and Pareto-effcient for the house allocation problem without endowments. In the experiment, RSD outperforms TTC. This can be attributed to more dominant strategy play under RSD. The behavioral theory of obvious strategy-proofness can partly explain this difference in dominant strategy play. Generally, subjects with extremely high and low levels of contingent reasoning play their dominant strategies. These results suggest that one strategy-proof mechanism may outperform another one if individuals are boundedly rational.
- Language
-
Englisch
- Bibliographic citation
-
Series: Preprints of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods ; No. 2017/13
- Classification
-
Wirtschaft
- Subject
-
market design
mechanism design
randomization
- Event
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (who)
-
Schmelzer, André
- Event
-
Veröffentlichung
- (who)
-
Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
- (where)
-
Bonn
- (when)
-
2017
- Handle
- Last update
-
10.03.2025, 11:43 AM CET
Data provider
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Object type
- Arbeitspapier
Associated
- Schmelzer, André
- Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
Time of origin
- 2017