The PRISMATIC project: protocol for a research programme on novel methods to improve reporting and peer review of systematic reviews of health evidence

to related objects

Location
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
Extent
1 Online-Ressource.
Language
Englisch

Bibliographic citation
The PRISMATIC project: protocol for a research programme on novel methods to improve reporting and peer review of systematic reviews of health evidence ; volume:12 ; number:1 ; day:13 ; month:10 ; year:2023 ; pages:1-8 ; date:12.2023
Systematic Reviews ; 12, Heft 1 (13.10.2023), 1-8, 12.2023

Creator
Page, Matthew J.
Moher, David
Brennan, Sue
McKenzie, Joanne E.
Contributor
SpringerLink (Online service)

DOI
10.1186/s13643-023-02363-6
URN
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2024020515012858750906
Rights
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
Last update
15.08.2025, 7:31 AM CEST

Data provider

This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Show original at data provider

Associated

  • Page, Matthew J.
  • Moher, David
  • Brennan, Sue
  • McKenzie, Joanne E.
  • SpringerLink (Online service)

Other Objects (12)

Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers

Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers

How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?

How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?

Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)

Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)

Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review

Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review

All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more

All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more

Helping editors, peer reviewers and authors improve the clarity, completeness and transparency of reporting health research

Helping editors, peer reviewers and authors improve the clarity, completeness and transparency of reporting health research

Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense

Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2014

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2014

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2015

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2015

CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014

Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014

Related objects