All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
2046-4053
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
online resource.
- Erschienen in
-
All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more ; volume:4 ; number:1 ; day:22 ; month:12 ; year:2015 ; pages:1-2 ; date:12.2015
Systematic Reviews ; 4, Heft 1 (22.12.2015), 1-2, 12.2015
- Urheber
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
-
Stewart, Lesley
Shekelle, Paul
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s13643-015-0163-7
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-2016110426787
- Rechteinformation
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
14.08.2025, 10:51 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Moher, David
- Stewart, Lesley
- Shekelle, Paul
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2014
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2015
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014
Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews
Investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: a methodologic review of guidance in the literature
Reviews
Reviews
Reviews
Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2014
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2015
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014
Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews
Investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: a methodologic review of guidance in the literature
Reviews
Reviews
Reviews
Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2014
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2015
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014
Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews
Investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: a methodologic review of guidance in the literature
Reviews
Reviews