All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
2046-4053
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Notes
-
online resource.
- Bibliographic citation
-
All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more ; volume:4 ; number:1 ; day:22 ; month:12 ; year:2015 ; pages:1-2 ; date:12.2015
Systematic Reviews ; 4, Heft 1 (22.12.2015), 1-2, 12.2015
- Creator
- Contributor
-
Stewart, Lesley
Shekelle, Paul
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s13643-015-0163-7
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-2016110426787
- Rights
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
14.08.2025, 10:51 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Moher, David
- Stewart, Lesley
- Shekelle, Paul
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2014
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2015
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014
Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews
Investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: a methodologic review of guidance in the literature
Reviews.
Reviews
Reviews
Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2014
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2015
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014
Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews
Investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: a methodologic review of guidance in the literature
Reviews.
Reviews
Reviews
Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2014
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2015
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014
Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews
Investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: a methodologic review of guidance in the literature
Reviews.
Reviews