Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
2046-4053
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
online resource.
- Erschienen in
-
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review ; volume:6 ; number:1 ; day:19 ; month:12 ; year:2017 ; pages:1-14 ; date:12.2017
Systematic Reviews ; 6, Heft 1 (19.12.2017), 1-14, 12.2017
- Schlagwort
-
Innere Medizin
Krankheit
Klinische Medizin
Allgemeinmedizin
Evidenz-basierte Medizin
- Urheber
-
Page, Matthew J.
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
- DOI
-
10.1186/s13643-017-0663-8
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-201803303445
- Rechteinformation
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
14.08.2025, 11:00 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Page, Matthew J.
- Moher, David
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Reflections and aspirations: the journal after 5 years
All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement
Erratum: the National Institutes of Health and guidance for reporting preclinical research
Recommendations for reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a systematic review
Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials
Happy birthday: we are one year old
Developing a guideline for clinical trial protocol content: Delphi consensus survey
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Reflections and aspirations: the journal after 5 years
All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement
Erratum: the National Institutes of Health and guidance for reporting preclinical research
Recommendations for reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a systematic review
Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials
Happy birthday: we are one year old
Developing a guideline for clinical trial protocol content: Delphi consensus survey
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Reflections and aspirations: the journal after 5 years
All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement
Erratum: the National Institutes of Health and guidance for reporting preclinical research
Recommendations for reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a systematic review
Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials
Happy birthday: we are one year old
Developing a guideline for clinical trial protocol content: Delphi consensus survey