Erratum: the National Institutes of Health and guidance for reporting preclinical research
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1741-7015
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Notes
-
online resource.
- Bibliographic citation
-
Erratum: the National Institutes of Health and guidance for reporting preclinical research ; volume:13 ; number:1 ; day:10 ; month:4 ; year:2015 ; pages:1-2 ; date:12.2015
BMC medicine ; 13, Heft 1 (10.4.2015), 1-2, 12.2015
- Creator
- Contributor
-
Avey, Marc
Antes, Gerd
Altman, Douglas G.
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s12916-015-0321-8
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-201611047314
- Rights
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
14.08.2025, 11:04 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Moher, David
- Avey, Marc
- Antes, Gerd
- Altman, Douglas G.
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014
CONSORT-SPI 2018 Explanation and Elaboration: guidance for reporting social and psychological intervention trials
The PRISMATIC project: protocol for a research programme on novel methods to improve reporting and peer review of systematic reviews of health evidence
Investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: a methodologic review of guidance in the literature
Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network
Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014
CONSORT-SPI 2018 Explanation and Elaboration: guidance for reporting social and psychological intervention trials
The PRISMATIC project: protocol for a research programme on novel methods to improve reporting and peer review of systematic reviews of health evidence
Investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: a methodologic review of guidance in the literature
Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network
Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014
CONSORT-SPI 2018 Explanation and Elaboration: guidance for reporting social and psychological intervention trials
The PRISMATIC project: protocol for a research programme on novel methods to improve reporting and peer review of systematic reviews of health evidence
Investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: a methodologic review of guidance in the literature
Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network
Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension