Erratum: the National Institutes of Health and guidance for reporting preclinical research
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1741-7015
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
online resource.
- Erschienen in
-
Erratum: the National Institutes of Health and guidance for reporting preclinical research ; volume:13 ; number:1 ; day:10 ; month:4 ; year:2015 ; pages:1-2 ; date:12.2015
BMC medicine ; 13, Heft 1 (10.4.2015), 1-2, 12.2015
- Urheber
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
-
Avey, Marc
Antes, Gerd
Altman, Douglas G.
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s12916-015-0321-8
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-201611047314
- Rechteinformation
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
14.08.2025, 11:04 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Moher, David
- Avey, Marc
- Antes, Gerd
- Altman, Douglas G.
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014
CONSORT-SPI 2018 Explanation and Elaboration: guidance for reporting social and psychological intervention trials
The PRISMATIC project: protocol for a research programme on novel methods to improve reporting and peer review of systematic reviews of health evidence
Investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: a methodologic review of guidance in the literature
Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network
Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014
CONSORT-SPI 2018 Explanation and Elaboration: guidance for reporting social and psychological intervention trials
The PRISMATIC project: protocol for a research programme on novel methods to improve reporting and peer review of systematic reviews of health evidence
Investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: a methodologic review of guidance in the literature
Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network
Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014
CONSORT-SPI 2018 Explanation and Elaboration: guidance for reporting social and psychological intervention trials
The PRISMATIC project: protocol for a research programme on novel methods to improve reporting and peer review of systematic reviews of health evidence
Investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: a methodologic review of guidance in the literature
Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network
Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension