The PRISMATIC project: protocol for a research programme on novel methods to improve reporting and peer review of systematic reviews of health evidence

zu Verbundenen Objekten

Standort
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
Umfang
1 Online-Ressource.
Sprache
Englisch

Erschienen in
The PRISMATIC project: protocol for a research programme on novel methods to improve reporting and peer review of systematic reviews of health evidence ; volume:12 ; number:1 ; day:13 ; month:10 ; year:2023 ; pages:1-8 ; date:12.2023
Systematic Reviews ; 12, Heft 1 (13.10.2023), 1-8, 12.2023

Urheber
Page, Matthew J.
Moher, David
Brennan, Sue
McKenzie, Joanne E.
Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
SpringerLink (Online service)

DOI
10.1186/s13643-023-02363-6
URN
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2024020515012858750906
Rechteinformation
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
Letzte Aktualisierung
15.08.2025, 07:31 MESZ

Datenpartner

Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Original beim Datenpartner anzeigen

Beteiligte

  • Page, Matthew J.
  • Moher, David
  • Brennan, Sue
  • McKenzie, Joanne E.
  • SpringerLink (Online service)

Ähnliche Objekte (12)

Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers

Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers

How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?

How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?

Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)

Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)

Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review

Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review

All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more

All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more

Helping editors, peer reviewers and authors improve the clarity, completeness and transparency of reporting health research

Helping editors, peer reviewers and authors improve the clarity, completeness and transparency of reporting health research

Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense

Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2014

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2014

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2015

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2015

CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014

Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014

Verbundene Objekte