Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
2046-4053
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Notes
-
online resource.
- Bibliographic citation
-
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review ; volume:6 ; number:1 ; day:19 ; month:12 ; year:2017 ; pages:1-14 ; date:12.2017
Systematic Reviews ; 6, Heft 1 (19.12.2017), 1-14, 12.2017
- Keyword
-
Innere Medizin
Krankheit
Klinische Medizin
Allgemeinmedizin
Evidenz-basierte Medizin
- Creator
-
Page, Matthew J.
- Contributor
- DOI
-
10.1186/s13643-017-0663-8
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-201803303445
- Rights
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
14.08.2025, 11:00 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Page, Matthew J.
- Moher, David
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Reflections and aspirations: the journal after 5 years
All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement
Erratum: the National Institutes of Health and guidance for reporting preclinical research
Recommendations for reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a systematic review
Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials
Happy birthday: we are one year old
Establishing a new journal for systematic review products
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Reflections and aspirations: the journal after 5 years
All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement
Erratum: the National Institutes of Health and guidance for reporting preclinical research
Recommendations for reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a systematic review
Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials
Happy birthday: we are one year old
Establishing a new journal for systematic review products
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Reflections and aspirations: the journal after 5 years
All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement
Erratum: the National Institutes of Health and guidance for reporting preclinical research
Recommendations for reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a systematic review
Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials
Happy birthday: we are one year old