Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
2046-4053
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
online resource.
- Erschienen in
-
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement ; volume:4 ; number:1 ; day:1 ; month:1 ; year:2015 ; pages:1-9 ; date:12.2015
Systematic Reviews ; 4, Heft 1 (1.1.2015), 1-9, 12.2015
- Klassifikation
-
Biowissenschaften, Biologie
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
-
Moher, David
Shamseer, Larissa
Clarke, Mike
Ghersi, Davina
Liberati, Alessandro
Petticrew, Mark
Shekelle, Paul
Stewart, Lesley A.
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-2017042912608
- Rechteinformation
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
14.08.2025, 11:01 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Moher, David
- Shamseer, Larissa
- Clarke, Mike
- Ghersi, Davina
- Liberati, Alessandro
- Petticrew, Mark
- Shekelle, Paul
- Stewart, Lesley A.
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews
Partially systematic thoughts on the history of systematic reviews
Can you believe what you read in the papers?
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Core outcome sets and trial registries
The effectiveness of different patient referral systems to shorten waiting times for elective surgeries: systematic review
Survey of challenges and best practice strategies for participant recruitment to research projects in northern ireland
Effects on patients of their healthcare practitioner's or institution's participation in clinical trials: a systematic review
Collating the knowledge base for core outcome set development: developing and appraising the search strategy for a systematic review
Cochrane systematic reviews as a source of information for practice and trials
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews
Partially systematic thoughts on the history of systematic reviews
Can you believe what you read in the papers?
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Core outcome sets and trial registries
The effectiveness of different patient referral systems to shorten waiting times for elective surgeries: systematic review
Survey of challenges and best practice strategies for participant recruitment to research projects in northern ireland
Effects on patients of their healthcare practitioner's or institution's participation in clinical trials: a systematic review
Collating the knowledge base for core outcome set development: developing and appraising the search strategy for a systematic review
Cochrane systematic reviews as a source of information for practice and trials
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews
Partially systematic thoughts on the history of systematic reviews
Can you believe what you read in the papers?
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Core outcome sets and trial registries
The effectiveness of different patient referral systems to shorten waiting times for elective surgeries: systematic review
Survey of challenges and best practice strategies for participant recruitment to research projects in northern ireland
Effects on patients of their healthcare practitioner's or institution's participation in clinical trials: a systematic review
Collating the knowledge base for core outcome set development: developing and appraising the search strategy for a systematic review