- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1745-6215
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Notes
-
online resource.
- Bibliographic citation
-
Core outcome sets and trial registries ; volume:16 ; number:1 ; day:14 ; month:5 ; year:2015 ; pages:1-3 ; date:12.2015
Trials ; 16, Heft 1 (14.5.2015), 1-3, 12.2015
- Creator
-
Clarke, Mike
- Contributor
-
Williamson, Paula
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s13063-015-0738-6
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-201611075069
- Rights
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
14.08.2025, 11:00 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Clarke, Mike
- Williamson, Paula
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
Collating the knowledge base for core outcome set development: developing and appraising the search strategy for a systematic review
Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews
Partially systematic thoughts on the history of systematic reviews
Can you believe what you read in the papers?
Has the rheumatoid arthritis (RA) core outcome set influenced the selection of study outcome measures?
Can a core outcome set improve the quality of systematic reviews? – a survey of the Co-ordinating Editors of Cochrane review groups
Towards core outcome set (COS) development: a follow-up descriptive survey of outcomes in Cochrane reviews
Evaluating interventions for informed consent for surgery (ICONS): Protocol for the development of a core outcome set
Core Outcome Set-STAndardised Protocol Items: the COS-STAP Statement
Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider
The COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) Initiative
Development of a core outcome set for informed consent for therapy: An international key stakeholder consensus study
Collating the knowledge base for core outcome set development: developing and appraising the search strategy for a systematic review
Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews
Partially systematic thoughts on the history of systematic reviews
Can you believe what you read in the papers?
Has the rheumatoid arthritis (RA) core outcome set influenced the selection of study outcome measures?
Can a core outcome set improve the quality of systematic reviews? – a survey of the Co-ordinating Editors of Cochrane review groups
Towards core outcome set (COS) development: a follow-up descriptive survey of outcomes in Cochrane reviews
Evaluating interventions for informed consent for surgery (ICONS): Protocol for the development of a core outcome set
Core Outcome Set-STAndardised Protocol Items: the COS-STAP Statement
Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider
The COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) Initiative
Development of a core outcome set for informed consent for therapy: An international key stakeholder consensus study
Collating the knowledge base for core outcome set development: developing and appraising the search strategy for a systematic review
Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews
Partially systematic thoughts on the history of systematic reviews
Can you believe what you read in the papers?
Has the rheumatoid arthritis (RA) core outcome set influenced the selection of study outcome measures?
Can a core outcome set improve the quality of systematic reviews? – a survey of the Co-ordinating Editors of Cochrane review groups
Towards core outcome set (COS) development: a follow-up descriptive survey of outcomes in Cochrane reviews
Evaluating interventions for informed consent for surgery (ICONS): Protocol for the development of a core outcome set
Core Outcome Set-STAndardised Protocol Items: the COS-STAP Statement
Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider
The COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) Initiative