Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
2046-4053
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Notes
-
online resource.
- Bibliographic citation
-
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement ; volume:4 ; number:1 ; day:1 ; month:1 ; year:2015 ; pages:1-9 ; date:12.2015
Systematic Reviews ; 4, Heft 1 (1.1.2015), 1-9, 12.2015
- Classification
-
Biowissenschaften, Biologie
- Contributor
-
Moher, David
Shamseer, Larissa
Clarke, Mike
Ghersi, Davina
Liberati, Alessandro
Petticrew, Mark
Shekelle, Paul
Stewart, Lesley A.
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-2017042912608
- Rights
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
14.08.2025, 11:01 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Moher, David
- Shamseer, Larissa
- Clarke, Mike
- Ghersi, Davina
- Liberati, Alessandro
- Petticrew, Mark
- Shekelle, Paul
- Stewart, Lesley A.
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews
Partially systematic thoughts on the history of systematic reviews
Can you believe what you read in the papers?
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Core outcome sets and trial registries
The effectiveness of different patient referral systems to shorten waiting times for elective surgeries: systematic review
Survey of challenges and best practice strategies for participant recruitment to research projects in northern ireland
Effects on patients of their healthcare practitioner's or institution's participation in clinical trials: a systematic review
Collating the knowledge base for core outcome set development: developing and appraising the search strategy for a systematic review
Cochrane systematic reviews as a source of information for practice and trials
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews
Partially systematic thoughts on the history of systematic reviews
Can you believe what you read in the papers?
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Core outcome sets and trial registries
The effectiveness of different patient referral systems to shorten waiting times for elective surgeries: systematic review
Survey of challenges and best practice strategies for participant recruitment to research projects in northern ireland
Effects on patients of their healthcare practitioner's or institution's participation in clinical trials: a systematic review
Collating the knowledge base for core outcome set development: developing and appraising the search strategy for a systematic review
Cochrane systematic reviews as a source of information for practice and trials
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews
Partially systematic thoughts on the history of systematic reviews
Can you believe what you read in the papers?
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Core outcome sets and trial registries
The effectiveness of different patient referral systems to shorten waiting times for elective surgeries: systematic review
Survey of challenges and best practice strategies for participant recruitment to research projects in northern ireland
Effects on patients of their healthcare practitioner's or institution's participation in clinical trials: a systematic review
Collating the knowledge base for core outcome set development: developing and appraising the search strategy for a systematic review