Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2014

to related objects

Location: Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main

ISSN: 2046-4053

Extent: Online-Ressource

Language: Englisch

Notes: online resource.

Bibliographic citation: Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2014 ; volume:4 ; number:1 ; day:21 ; month:2 ; year:2015 ; pages:1-4 ; date:12.2015
Systematic Reviews ; 4, Heft 1 (21.2.2015), 1-4, 12.2015

Creator: Moher, David

Contributor: Shekelle, Paul
Stewart, Lesley A.
SpringerLink (Online service)

DOI: 10.1186/s13643-015-0003-9

URN: urn:nbn:de:1111-201609065207

Rights: Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.

Last update: 14.08.2025, 10:59 AM CEST

Data provider

This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Show original at data provider

Associated

Moher, David
Shekelle, Paul
Stewart, Lesley A.
SpringerLink (Online service)

Other Objects (12)

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2015

Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014

All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more

Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers

Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review

Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense

How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?

Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Reproductive Health in 2015

The PRISMATIC project: protocol for a research programme on novel methods to improve reporting and peer review of systematic reviews of health evidence

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2015

Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014

All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more

Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers

Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review

Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense

How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?

Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Reproductive Health in 2015

The PRISMATIC project: protocol for a research programme on novel methods to improve reporting and peer review of systematic reviews of health evidence

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2015

Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014

All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more

Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers

Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review

Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense

How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?

Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Reproductive Health in 2015

The PRISMATIC project: protocol for a research programme on novel methods to improve reporting and peer review of systematic reviews of health evidence

Cultural heritage institutions wishing to register will find more information here.

Fields marked * need to be filled in.

Username*

Please enter your username

Email*

Please enter your email address

Please do not fill this field

First name

Last name

Password*

Please enter your password

Confirm password*

Please enter the same password

I have read the terms of use and the privacy policy for the collection of personal data and accept them. *

This field is required.

I would like to subscribe to the newsletter of the Deutsche Digitale Bibliothek. See newsletter subscription info.

Account created

Your "My DDB" account has been successfully created. Before you can log in to your account, you must click the confirmation link in the message we just sent to the email address you provided.

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2014

Object Details

References and Relationships

Contributors, Places and Time

Further information

Data provider

Associated

Other Objects (12)

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2015

Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014

All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more

Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers

Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review

Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense

How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?

Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Reproductive Health in 2015

The PRISMATIC project: protocol for a research programme on novel methods to improve reporting and peer review of systematic reviews of health evidence

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2015

Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014

All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more

Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers

Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review

Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense

How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?

Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Reproductive Health in 2015

The PRISMATIC project: protocol for a research programme on novel methods to improve reporting and peer review of systematic reviews of health evidence

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2015

Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014

All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more

Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers

Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review

Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense

How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?

Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Reproductive Health in 2015

The PRISMATIC project: protocol for a research programme on novel methods to improve reporting and peer review of systematic reviews of health evidence

Related objects

Reset password