Do systematic reviews on pediatric topics need special methodological considerations?

to related objects

Location
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
ISSN
1471-2431
Extent
Online-Ressource
Language
Englisch
Notes
online resource.

Bibliographic citation
Do systematic reviews on pediatric topics need special methodological considerations? ; volume:17 ; number:1 ; day:6 ; month:3 ; year:2017 ; pages:1-11 ; date:12.2017
BMC pediatrics ; 17, Heft 1 (6.3.2017), 1-11, 12.2017

Keyword
Pädiatrie
Kinderkrankheit

Creator
Farid-Kapadia, Mufiza
Contributor
Askie, Lisa
Hartling, Lisa
Contopoulos-Ioannidis, Despina
Bhutta, Zulfiqar A.
Soll, Roger
Moher, David
Offringa, Martin
SpringerLink (Online service)

DOI
10.1186/s12887-017-0812-1
URN
urn:nbn:de:1111-201703218039
Rights
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
Last update
14.08.2025, 10:57 AM CEST

Data provider

This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Show original at data provider

Associated

  • Farid-Kapadia, Mufiza
  • Askie, Lisa
  • Hartling, Lisa
  • Contopoulos-Ioannidis, Despina
  • Bhutta, Zulfiqar A.
  • Soll, Roger
  • Moher, David
  • Offringa, Martin
  • SpringerLink (Online service)

Other Objects (12)

Systematic reviews on selected nutrition interventions: descriptive assessment of conduct and methodological challenges

Systematic reviews on selected nutrition interventions: descriptive assessment of conduct and methodological challenges

All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more

All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more

Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers

Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers

Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review

Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review

Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense

Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense

How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?

How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2014

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2014

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2015

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2015

Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)

Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)

Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014

Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014

The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration

The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration

A review of external assistance and aid effectiveness for maternal and child health: Challenges and opportunities

Arbeitspapier

A review of external assistance and aid effectiveness for maternal and child health: Challenges and opportunities

Related objects