Do systematic reviews on pediatric topics need special methodological considerations?
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1471-2431
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
online resource.
- Erschienen in
-
Do systematic reviews on pediatric topics need special methodological considerations? ; volume:17 ; number:1 ; day:6 ; month:3 ; year:2017 ; pages:1-11 ; date:12.2017
BMC pediatrics ; 17, Heft 1 (6.3.2017), 1-11, 12.2017
- Schlagwort
-
Pädiatrie
Kinderkrankheit
- Urheber
-
Farid-Kapadia, Mufiza
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
-
Askie, Lisa
Hartling, Lisa
Contopoulos-Ioannidis, Despina
Bhutta, Zulfiqar A.
Soll, Roger
Moher, David
Offringa, Martin
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s12887-017-0812-1
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-201703218039
- Rechteinformation
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
14.08.2025, 10:57 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Farid-Kapadia, Mufiza
- Askie, Lisa
- Hartling, Lisa
- Contopoulos-Ioannidis, Despina
- Bhutta, Zulfiqar A.
- Soll, Roger
- Moher, David
- Offringa, Martin
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Systematic reviews on selected nutrition interventions: descriptive assessment of conduct and methodological challenges
All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2014
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2015
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014
The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration
A review of external assistance and aid effectiveness for maternal and child health: Challenges and opportunities
Systematic reviews on selected nutrition interventions: descriptive assessment of conduct and methodological challenges
All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2014
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2015
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014
The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration
A review of external assistance and aid effectiveness for maternal and child health: Challenges and opportunities
Systematic reviews on selected nutrition interventions: descriptive assessment of conduct and methodological challenges
All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2014
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2015
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014
The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration