The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
2046-4053
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
online resource.
- Erschienen in
-
The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration ; volume:2 ; number:1 ; day:23 ; month:9 ; year:2013 ; pages:1-8 ; date:12.2013
Systematic Reviews ; 2, Heft 1 (23.9.2013), 1-8, 12.2013
- Urheber
-
Turner, Lucy
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
-
Boutron, Isabelle
Hróbjartsson, Asbjørn
Altman, Douglas G.
Moher, David
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/2046-4053-2-79
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-201607118097
- Rechteinformation
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
14.08.2025, 10:51 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Turner, Lucy
- Boutron, Isabelle
- Hróbjartsson, Asbjørn
- Altman, Douglas G.
- Moher, David
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Evaluation of the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials: focus groups, online survey, proposed recommendations and their implementation
Cochrane
Lord Cochrane
Cochrane, John
Lord Cochrane.
Comparative analysis of Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews over three decades
Celebrating methodological challenges and changes: reflecting on the emergence and importance of the role of qualitative evidence in Cochrane reviews
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Evaluation of the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials: focus groups, online survey, proposed recommendations and their implementation
Cochrane
Lord Cochrane
Cochrane, John
Lord Cochrane.
Comparative analysis of Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews over three decades
Celebrating methodological challenges and changes: reflecting on the emergence and importance of the role of qualitative evidence in Cochrane reviews
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Evaluation of the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials: focus groups, online survey, proposed recommendations and their implementation
Cochrane
Lord Cochrane
Cochrane, John
Lord Cochrane.
Comparative analysis of Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews over three decades
Celebrating methodological challenges and changes: reflecting on the emergence and importance of the role of qualitative evidence in Cochrane reviews
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials