Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
2046-4053
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
online resource.
- Erschienen in
-
Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa ; volume:1 ; number:1 ; day:29 ; month:11 ; year:2012 ; pages:1-7 ; date:12.2012
Systematic Reviews ; 1, Heft 1 (29.11.2012), 1-7, 12.2012
- Urheber
-
Turner, Lucy
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
- DOI
-
10.1186/2046-4053-1-60
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-201607116819
- Rechteinformation
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
14.08.2025, 10:46 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Turner, Lucy
- Shamseer, Larissa
- Altman, Douglas G.
- Schulz, Kenneth F.
- Moher, David
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials
The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors'
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Helping editors, peer reviewers and authors improve the clarity, completeness and transparency of reporting health research
Update on the endorsement of CONSORT by high impact factor journals: a survey of journal “Instructions to Authors” in 2014
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials
The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors'
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Helping editors, peer reviewers and authors improve the clarity, completeness and transparency of reporting health research
Update on the endorsement of CONSORT by high impact factor journals: a survey of journal “Instructions to Authors” in 2014
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials
The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors'
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Helping editors, peer reviewers and authors improve the clarity, completeness and transparency of reporting health research
Update on the endorsement of CONSORT by high impact factor journals: a survey of journal “Instructions to Authors” in 2014
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense