Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
2046-4053
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Notes
-
online resource.
- Bibliographic citation
-
Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa ; volume:1 ; number:1 ; day:29 ; month:11 ; year:2012 ; pages:1-7 ; date:12.2012
Systematic Reviews ; 1, Heft 1 (29.11.2012), 1-7, 12.2012
- Creator
-
Turner, Lucy
- Contributor
- DOI
-
10.1186/2046-4053-1-60
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-201607116819
- Rights
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
14.08.2025, 10:46 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Turner, Lucy
- Shamseer, Larissa
- Altman, Douglas G.
- Schulz, Kenneth F.
- Moher, David
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials
The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors'
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Helping editors, peer reviewers and authors improve the clarity, completeness and transparency of reporting health research
Update on the endorsement of CONSORT by high impact factor journals: a survey of journal “Instructions to Authors” in 2014
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials
The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors'
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Helping editors, peer reviewers and authors improve the clarity, completeness and transparency of reporting health research
Update on the endorsement of CONSORT by high impact factor journals: a survey of journal “Instructions to Authors” in 2014
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials
The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors'
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Helping editors, peer reviewers and authors improve the clarity, completeness and transparency of reporting health research
Update on the endorsement of CONSORT by high impact factor journals: a survey of journal “Instructions to Authors” in 2014
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense