The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration

to related objects

Location: Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main

ISSN: 2046-4053

Extent: Online-Ressource

Language: Englisch

Notes: online resource.

Bibliographic citation: The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration ; volume:2 ; number:1 ; day:23 ; month:9 ; year:2013 ; pages:1-8 ; date:12.2013
Systematic Reviews ; 2, Heft 1 (23.9.2013), 1-8, 12.2013

Creator: Turner, Lucy

Contributor: Boutron, Isabelle
Hróbjartsson, Asbjørn
Altman, Douglas G.
Moher, David
SpringerLink (Online service)

DOI: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-79

URN: urn:nbn:de:1111-201607118097

Rights: Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.

Last update: 14.08.2025, 10:51 AM CEST

Data provider

This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Show original at data provider

Associated

Turner, Lucy
Boutron, Isabelle
Hróbjartsson, Asbjørn
Altman, Douglas G.
Moher, David
SpringerLink (Online service)

Other Objects (12)

Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa

Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers

Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review

Evaluation of the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials: focus groups, online survey, proposed recommendations and their implementation

Abschnitt

Cochrane

Fotografie

Lord Cochrane

Akten

Cochrane, John

Kapitel

Lord Cochrane.

Comparative analysis of Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews over three decades

Celebrating methodological challenges and changes: reflecting on the emergence and importance of the role of qualitative evidence in Cochrane reviews

The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials

Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)

Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa

Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers

Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review

Evaluation of the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials: focus groups, online survey, proposed recommendations and their implementation

Abschnitt

Cochrane

Fotografie

Lord Cochrane

Akten

Cochrane, John

Kapitel

Lord Cochrane.

Comparative analysis of Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews over three decades

Celebrating methodological challenges and changes: reflecting on the emergence and importance of the role of qualitative evidence in Cochrane reviews

The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials

Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)

Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa

Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers

Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review

Evaluation of the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials: focus groups, online survey, proposed recommendations and their implementation

Abschnitt

Cochrane

Fotografie

Lord Cochrane

Akten

Cochrane, John

Kapitel

Lord Cochrane.

Comparative analysis of Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews over three decades

Celebrating methodological challenges and changes: reflecting on the emergence and importance of the role of qualitative evidence in Cochrane reviews

The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials

Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)

Cultural heritage institutions wishing to register will find more information here.

Fields marked * need to be filled in.

Username*

Please enter your username

Email*

Please enter your email address

Please do not fill this field

First name

Last name

Password*

Please enter your password

Confirm password*

Please enter the same password

I have read the terms of use and the privacy policy for the collection of personal data and accept them. *

This field is required.

I would like to subscribe to the newsletter of the Deutsche Digitale Bibliothek. See newsletter subscription info.

Account created

Your "My DDB" account has been successfully created. Before you can log in to your account, you must click the confirmation link in the message we just sent to the email address you provided.

The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration

Object Details

References and Relationships

Contributors, Places and Time

Further information

Data provider

Associated

Other Objects (12)

Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa

Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers

Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review

Evaluation of the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials: focus groups, online survey, proposed recommendations and their implementation

Cochrane

Lord Cochrane

Cochrane, John

Lord Cochrane.

Comparative analysis of Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews over three decades

Celebrating methodological challenges and changes: reflecting on the emergence and importance of the role of qualitative evidence in Cochrane reviews

The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials

Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)

Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa

Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers

Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review

Evaluation of the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials: focus groups, online survey, proposed recommendations and their implementation

Cochrane

Lord Cochrane

Cochrane, John

Lord Cochrane.

Comparative analysis of Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews over three decades

Celebrating methodological challenges and changes: reflecting on the emergence and importance of the role of qualitative evidence in Cochrane reviews

The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials

Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)

Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa

Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers

Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review

Evaluation of the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials: focus groups, online survey, proposed recommendations and their implementation

Cochrane

Lord Cochrane

Cochrane, John

Lord Cochrane.

Comparative analysis of Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews over three decades

Celebrating methodological challenges and changes: reflecting on the emergence and importance of the role of qualitative evidence in Cochrane reviews

The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials

Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)

Related objects

Reset password