Arbeitspapier

Optimal Liability when Consumers Mispredict Product Usage

We contrast alternative liability rules for social control of product risks when heterogeneous consumers considering purchasing a durable good due to cognitive errors and biases mispredict future product benefits and, thus, the extent of future product usage. Since the expected consumer harm directly depends on the level of product usage, the consequences of consumers’ mispredictions vary with the prevailing liability regime. We first characterize the consumers’ purchasing decision and the equilibrium levels of safety and activity from the product’s usage under no liability, strict liability, and negligence rule. We then compare the three legal regimes from the social welfare standpoint. Our analysis clarifies why and how the choice of the socially optimal legal regime depends on the distribution of consumers based on the direction and extent of their mispredictions. When consumers are susceptible to mispredicting future product benefits and usage, the appropriate legal regime is likely product-specific.

Language
Englisch

Bibliographic citation
Series: CESifo Working Paper ; No. 5903

Classification
Wirtschaft
Tort Law and Product Liability; Forensic Economics
Allocative Efficiency; Cost-Benefit Analysis
Subject
misprediction
activity
durable consumer products
product risk
liability rules

Event
Geistige Schöpfung
(who)
Baniak, Andrzej
Grajzl, Peter
Event
Veröffentlichung
(who)
Center for Economic Studies and ifo Institute (CESifo)
(where)
Munich
(when)
2016

Handle
Last update
10.03.2025, 11:42 AM CET

Data provider

This object is provided by:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Object type

  • Arbeitspapier

Associated

  • Baniak, Andrzej
  • Grajzl, Peter
  • Center for Economic Studies and ifo Institute (CESifo)

Time of origin

  • 2016

Other Objects (12)