A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1741-7015
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Notes
-
online resource.
- Bibliographic citation
-
A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals ; volume:17 ; number:1 ; day:20 ; month:6 ; year:2019 ; pages:1-14 ; date:12.2019
BMC medicine ; 17, Heft 1 (20.6.2019), 1-14, 12.2019
- Creator
- Contributor
-
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s12916-019-1347-0
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2019112605382732582403
- Rights
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
14.08.2025, 10:51 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Glonti, Ketevan
- Cauchi, Daniel
- Cobo, Erik
- Boutron, Isabelle
- Moher, David
- Hren, Darko
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Establishing a new journal for systematic review products
Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers
Correction: Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers
Checklists to detect potential predatory biomedical journals: a systematic review
Systematic review of the effectiveness of training programs in writing for scholarly publication, journal editing, and manuscript peer review (protocol)
Helping editors, peer reviewers and authors improve the clarity, completeness and transparency of reporting health research
Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors'
The effects of sign language on spoken language acquisition in children with hearing loss: a systematic review protocol
Randomized trials published in some Chinese journals: how many are randomized?
The PRISMATIC project: protocol for a research programme on novel methods to improve reporting and peer review of systematic reviews of health evidence
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Establishing a new journal for systematic review products
Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers
Correction: Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers
Checklists to detect potential predatory biomedical journals: a systematic review
Systematic review of the effectiveness of training programs in writing for scholarly publication, journal editing, and manuscript peer review (protocol)
Helping editors, peer reviewers and authors improve the clarity, completeness and transparency of reporting health research
Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors'
The effects of sign language on spoken language acquisition in children with hearing loss: a systematic review protocol
Randomized trials published in some Chinese journals: how many are randomized?
The PRISMATIC project: protocol for a research programme on novel methods to improve reporting and peer review of systematic reviews of health evidence
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Establishing a new journal for systematic review products
Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers
Correction: Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers
Checklists to detect potential predatory biomedical journals: a systematic review
Systematic review of the effectiveness of training programs in writing for scholarly publication, journal editing, and manuscript peer review (protocol)
Helping editors, peer reviewers and authors improve the clarity, completeness and transparency of reporting health research
Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors'
The effects of sign language on spoken language acquisition in children with hearing loss: a systematic review protocol
Randomized trials published in some Chinese journals: how many are randomized?