Systematic review of the effectiveness of training programs in writing for scholarly publication, journal editing, and manuscript peer review (protocol)
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
2046-4053
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Notes
-
online resource.
- Bibliographic citation
-
Systematic review of the effectiveness of training programs in writing for scholarly publication, journal editing, and manuscript peer review (protocol) ; volume:2 ; number:1 ; day:17 ; month:6 ; year:2013 ; pages:1-7 ; date:12.2013
Systematic Reviews ; 2, Heft 1 (17.6.2013), 1-7, 12.2013
- Creator
-
Galipeau, James
- Contributor
-
Moher, David
Skidmore, Becky
Campbell, Craig
Hendry, Paul
Cameron, D William
Hébert, Paul C.
Palepu, Anita
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/2046-4053-2-41
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-201607117511
- Rights
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
14.08.2025, 10:52 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Galipeau, James
- Moher, David
- Skidmore, Becky
- Campbell, Craig
- Hendry, Paul
- Cameron, D William
- Hébert, Paul C.
- Palepu, Anita
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Establishing a new journal for systematic review products
A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals
The effects of sign language on spoken language acquisition in children with hearing loss: a systematic review protocol
The PRISMATIC project: protocol for a research programme on novel methods to improve reporting and peer review of systematic reviews of health evidence
Investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: a methodologic review of guidance in the literature
Status, use and impact of sharing individual participant data from clinical trials: a scoping review
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
Happy birthday: we are one year old
Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Establishing a new journal for systematic review products
A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals
The effects of sign language on spoken language acquisition in children with hearing loss: a systematic review protocol
The PRISMATIC project: protocol for a research programme on novel methods to improve reporting and peer review of systematic reviews of health evidence
Investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: a methodologic review of guidance in the literature
Status, use and impact of sharing individual participant data from clinical trials: a scoping review
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
Happy birthday: we are one year old
Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Establishing a new journal for systematic review products
A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals
The effects of sign language on spoken language acquisition in children with hearing loss: a systematic review protocol
The PRISMATIC project: protocol for a research programme on novel methods to improve reporting and peer review of systematic reviews of health evidence
Investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: a methodologic review of guidance in the literature
Status, use and impact of sharing individual participant data from clinical trials: a scoping review
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
Happy birthday: we are one year old
Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014