Arbeitspapier

Does banning affirmative action harm college student quality?

Banning affirmative action from college admissions decisions cannot prevent an admissions office that cares about diversity from achieving it through channels other than the explicit consideration of race We construct a model of college admissions where candidates from two groups with different average qualifications compete for a fixed number of seats When an admissions office that cares both about the quality and diversity of its entering class can use group identity as a criterion for admissions its preferred admissions rule selects the best-qualified candidates from each group When it cannot use affirmative action the admissions office's preferred rule generally does not select the best-qualified candidates from either group: it randomizes over candidates to achieve diversity at the expense of within-group selection A ban always reduces diversity and may also lower average quality Moreover even when a total ban on affirmative action raises average quality a partial ban may raise average quality even more

Language
Englisch

Bibliographic citation
Series: Working Paper ; No. 440

Classification
Wirtschaft
Subject
Arbeitsmarktdiskriminierung
Studium
Qualifikation
USA

Event
Geistige Schöpfung
(who)
Chan, Jimmy
Eyster, Erik
Event
Veröffentlichung
(who)
The Johns Hopkins University, Department of Economics
(where)
Baltimore, MD
(when)
1999

Handle
Last update
10.03.2025, 11:44 AM CET

Data provider

This object is provided by:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Object type

  • Arbeitspapier

Associated

  • Chan, Jimmy
  • Eyster, Erik
  • The Johns Hopkins University, Department of Economics

Time of origin

  • 1999

Other Objects (12)