- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1475-2891
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Notes
-
online resource.
- Bibliographic citation
-
Health outcomes of non-nutritive sweeteners: analysis of the research landscape ; volume:16 ; number:1 ; day:8 ; month:9 ; year:2017 ; pages:1-21 ; date:12.2017
Nutrition journal ; 16, Heft 1 (8.9.2017), 1-21, 12.2017
- Keyword
-
Ernährung
Ernährungsberatung
Diätetik
- Creator
-
Lohner, Szimonetta
- Contributor
- DOI
-
10.1186/s12937-017-0278-x
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-201711129120
- Rights
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
15.08.2025, 7:35 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Lohner, Szimonetta
- Töws, Ingrid
- Meerpohl, Jörg J.
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
Health outcomes of non-nutritive sweeteners: analysis of the research landscape
Wissenschaftliche Publikationspraxis in der klinischen Medizin : Wissenstransfer als Voraussetzung für evidenzbasierte Medizin
Protocol for the development of the Chatbot Assessment Reporting Tool (CHART) for clinical advice
Improving the trustworthiness of findings from nutrition evidence syntheses: assessing risk of bias and rating the certainty of evidence
Improving the trustworthiness of findings from nutrition evidence syntheses: assessing risk of bias and rating the certainty of evidence
Efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines
A tool to assess risk of bias in non-randomized follow-up studies of exposure effects (ROBINS-E)
Using patient values and preferences to inform the importance of health outcomes in practice guideline development following the GRADE approach
Systematic reviews should be at the heart of continuing medical education
Good or best practice statements: proposal for the operationalisation and implementation of GRADE guidance
Developing trustworthy recommendations as part of an urgent response (1-2 weeks): a GRADE concept paper
GRADE equity guidelines 3: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: rating the certainty of synthesized evidence
Health outcomes of non-nutritive sweeteners: analysis of the research landscape
Wissenschaftliche Publikationspraxis in der klinischen Medizin : Wissenstransfer als Voraussetzung für evidenzbasierte Medizin
Protocol for the development of the Chatbot Assessment Reporting Tool (CHART) for clinical advice
Improving the trustworthiness of findings from nutrition evidence syntheses: assessing risk of bias and rating the certainty of evidence
Improving the trustworthiness of findings from nutrition evidence syntheses: assessing risk of bias and rating the certainty of evidence
Efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines
A tool to assess risk of bias in non-randomized follow-up studies of exposure effects (ROBINS-E)
Using patient values and preferences to inform the importance of health outcomes in practice guideline development following the GRADE approach
Systematic reviews should be at the heart of continuing medical education
Good or best practice statements: proposal for the operationalisation and implementation of GRADE guidance
Developing trustworthy recommendations as part of an urgent response (1-2 weeks): a GRADE concept paper
GRADE equity guidelines 3: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: rating the certainty of synthesized evidence
Health outcomes of non-nutritive sweeteners: analysis of the research landscape
Wissenschaftliche Publikationspraxis in der klinischen Medizin : Wissenstransfer als Voraussetzung für evidenzbasierte Medizin
Protocol for the development of the Chatbot Assessment Reporting Tool (CHART) for clinical advice
Improving the trustworthiness of findings from nutrition evidence syntheses: assessing risk of bias and rating the certainty of evidence
Improving the trustworthiness of findings from nutrition evidence syntheses: assessing risk of bias and rating the certainty of evidence
Efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines
A tool to assess risk of bias in non-randomized follow-up studies of exposure effects (ROBINS-E)
Using patient values and preferences to inform the importance of health outcomes in practice guideline development following the GRADE approach
Systematic reviews should be at the heart of continuing medical education
Good or best practice statements: proposal for the operationalisation and implementation of GRADE guidance
Developing trustworthy recommendations as part of an urgent response (1-2 weeks): a GRADE concept paper