Monografie
Wissenschaftliche Publikationspraxis in der klinischen Medizin : Wissenstransfer als Voraussetzung für evidenzbasierte Medizin
- Sprache
-
Deutsch; Englisch
- Umfang
-
31 Blätter, 211 verschieden gezählte Seiten
- Identifier
-
1094707937
Thema
Hochschulschrift
Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
- Inhaltsverzeichnis
- Rechteinformation
-
Der Zugriff auf Teile des Objekts ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
15.04.2024, 08:51 MESZ
Objekttyp
- Monografie
Beteiligte
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Willingness to participate in, support or carry out scientific studies for benefit assessment of available medical interventions: a stakeholder survey
Systematic reviews should be at the heart of continuing medical education
Developing trustworthy recommendations as part of an urgent response (1-2 weeks): a GRADE concept paper
GRADE equity guidelines 1: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: introduction and rationale
GRADE equity guidelines 3: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: rating the certainty of synthesized evidence
Which actionable statements qualify as good practice statements In Covid-19 guidelines? : : a systematic appraisal
Public information needs and preferences on COVID-19: a cross-sectional study
Improving the trustworthiness of findings from nutrition evidence syntheses: assessing risk of bias and rating the certainty of evidence
Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: cohort study on trial protocols and journal publications
The worldwide clinical trial research response to the COVID-19 pandemic - the first 100 days [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
GRADE evidence to decision (EtD) frameworks for adoption, adaptation, and de novo development of trustworthy recommendations: GRADE-ADOLOPMENT
Using patient values and preferences to inform the importance of health outcomes in practice guideline development following the GRADE approach
Willingness to participate in, support or carry out scientific studies for benefit assessment of available medical interventions: a stakeholder survey
Systematic reviews should be at the heart of continuing medical education
Developing trustworthy recommendations as part of an urgent response (1-2 weeks): a GRADE concept paper
GRADE equity guidelines 1: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: introduction and rationale
GRADE equity guidelines 3: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: rating the certainty of synthesized evidence
Which actionable statements qualify as good practice statements In Covid-19 guidelines? : : a systematic appraisal
Public information needs and preferences on COVID-19: a cross-sectional study
Improving the trustworthiness of findings from nutrition evidence syntheses: assessing risk of bias and rating the certainty of evidence
Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: cohort study on trial protocols and journal publications
The worldwide clinical trial research response to the COVID-19 pandemic - the first 100 days [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
GRADE evidence to decision (EtD) frameworks for adoption, adaptation, and de novo development of trustworthy recommendations: GRADE-ADOLOPMENT
Using patient values and preferences to inform the importance of health outcomes in practice guideline development following the GRADE approach
Willingness to participate in, support or carry out scientific studies for benefit assessment of available medical interventions: a stakeholder survey
Systematic reviews should be at the heart of continuing medical education
Developing trustworthy recommendations as part of an urgent response (1-2 weeks): a GRADE concept paper
GRADE equity guidelines 1: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: introduction and rationale
GRADE equity guidelines 3: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: rating the certainty of synthesized evidence
Which actionable statements qualify as good practice statements In Covid-19 guidelines? : : a systematic appraisal
Public information needs and preferences on COVID-19: a cross-sectional study
Improving the trustworthiness of findings from nutrition evidence syntheses: assessing risk of bias and rating the certainty of evidence
Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: cohort study on trial protocols and journal publications
The worldwide clinical trial research response to the COVID-19 pandemic - the first 100 days [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
GRADE evidence to decision (EtD) frameworks for adoption, adaptation, and de novo development of trustworthy recommendations: GRADE-ADOLOPMENT