After the first annual reports to the Arms Trade Treaty: how to overcome gaps and reporting deficits?

Comment | Stellungnahme

The ATT (Arms Trade Treaty) as such does not automatically end irresponsible arms exports. Governments and civil society organizations must challenge arms transfer practices that they consider in violation of the ATT. Transparent reporting on arms transfers is the basis for this, but the first round of annual reports shows that much work needs to be done to make the ATT reporting system work effectively. The central parameters of the reporting template - actual/authorized transfers, number/value of transfers, reporting period, central definitions of weapon categories - must be standardized so that the information contained in the reports can be compared. The use of these templates must be mandatory. Public reporting - also on the transfer of small arms and light weapons - should also be mandatory. If governments want to withhold information on particular transfers, they should at least be explicit about this and provide an explanation. States that are willing to fulfill their reporting requirements but lack the capacities to do so should be offered international assistance. Likewise, meeting the reporting commitments should play a role when assessing potential cooperation partners on the international arms market. Several states provide voluntary information beyond the minimum standards. To contribute to the muchneeded improvement of the reporting system and to strengthen the norms and rules of the ATT, more States Parties - particularly EU Member States - should offer additional information in their next annual reports.

Angaben zum Objekt

• ISSN: 2521-7801
• Umfang: Seite(n): 7
• Sprache: Englisch
• Anmerkungen: Status: Veröffentlichungsversion; begutachtet

Verweise und Beziehungen

• Erschienen in: BICC Policy Brief (4/2016)

Klassifikation und Themen

• Thema: Politikwissenschaft ; Friedens- und Konfliktforschung, Sicherheitspolitik ; Waffe ; Berichterstattung ; Rüstungskontrolle ; Handel ; Transparenz ; internationales Abkommen ; Monitoring ; Selbstverpflichtung ; Proliferation

Beteiligte, Orts- und Zeitangaben

• Ereignis: Geistige Schöpfung
• (wer): Bales, Marius ; Mutschler, Max M.
• Ereignis: Veröffentlichung
• (wer): Bonn International Center for Conversion (BICC)
• (wo): Deutschland, Bonn
• (wann): 2016

Weitere Informationen

• URN: urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-62095-1
• Rechteinformation: GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. Bibliothek Köln
• Letzte Aktualisierung: 21.06.2024, 16:26 MESZ