- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1741-7015
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Notes
-
online resource.
- Bibliographic citation
-
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement ; volume:11 ; number:1 ; day:25 ; month:3 ; year:2013 ; pages:1-6 ; date:12.2013
BMC medicine ; 11, Heft 1 (25.3.2013), 1-6, 12.2013
- Creator
-
Husereau, Don
- Contributor
-
Drummond, Michael F.
Petrou, Stavros
Carswell, Chris
Moher, David
Greenberg, Dan
Augustovski, Federico
Briggs, Andrew H.
Mauskopf, Josephine
Loder, Elizabeth
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/1741-7015-11-80
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-2016072226411
- Rights
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
14.08.2025, 10:50 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Husereau, Don
- Drummond, Michael F.
- Petrou, Stavros
- Carswell, Chris
- Moher, David
- Greenberg, Dan
- Augustovski, Federico
- Briggs, Andrew H.
- Mauskopf, Josephine
- Loder, Elizabeth
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials
Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa
Erratum: the National Institutes of Health and guidance for reporting preclinical research
PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews
Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors'
The PRISMATIC project: protocol for a research programme on novel methods to improve reporting and peer review of systematic reviews of health evidence
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials
Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa
Erratum: the National Institutes of Health and guidance for reporting preclinical research
PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews
Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors'
The PRISMATIC project: protocol for a research programme on novel methods to improve reporting and peer review of systematic reviews of health evidence
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials
Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa
Erratum: the National Institutes of Health and guidance for reporting preclinical research
PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews
Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors'