Arbeitspapier

Whom to blame? An experiment of collective harming and punishing

In a situation, where it is efficient for one of two parties to pollute but highly inefficient if both parties do so, the harmed third party can freely impose its damage claims on both parties what crucially determines which equilibrium to expect. Whereas 'equality before the law' requires equal punishments, efficient equilibria are predicted when holding one party responsible and letting the other escape punishment. After discussing equilibrium selection for the game, we report on an experiment with two treatment variables: one that determines when the harmed party announces its potential damage claims and one varying a game- and justice-unrelated difference between the two culprits. According to our experimental data, 'equality before the law' dominates but is weakened by asymmetry in wealth and the possibility to announce sanctions.

Sprache
Englisch

Erschienen in
Series: Jena Economic Research Papers ; No. 2011,046

Klassifikation
Wirtschaft
Noncooperative Games
Design of Experiments: Laboratory, Group Behavior
Law and Economics: General
Thema
law and economics
equality vs. efficiency
equilibrium selection
laboratory experiments
Umwelthaftung
Rechtsdurchsetzung
Grundrecht
Wirtschaftliche Effizienz
Nichtkooperatives Spiel
Gleichgewicht
Test

Ereignis
Geistige Schöpfung
(wer)
Güth, Werner
Otsubo, Hironori
Ereignis
Veröffentlichung
(wer)
Friedrich Schiller University Jena and Max Planck Institute of Economics
(wo)
Jena
(wann)
2011

Handle
Letzte Aktualisierung
10.03.2025, 11:43 MEZ

Datenpartner

Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.

Objekttyp

  • Arbeitspapier

Beteiligte

  • Güth, Werner
  • Otsubo, Hironori
  • Friedrich Schiller University Jena and Max Planck Institute of Economics

Entstanden

  • 2011

Ähnliche Objekte (12)