Checklists to detect potential predatory biomedical journals: a systematic review
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1741-7015
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Notes
-
online resource.
- Bibliographic citation
-
Checklists to detect potential predatory biomedical journals: a systematic review ; volume:18 ; number:1 ; day:18 ; month:5 ; year:2020 ; pages:1-20 ; date:12.2020
BMC medicine ; 18, Heft 1 (18.5.2020), 1-20, 12.2020
- Creator
-
Cukier, Samantha
Helal, Lucas
Rice, Danielle B.
Pupkaite, Justina
Ahmadzai, Nadera
Wilson, Mitchell
Skidmore, Becky
Lalu, Manoj M.
Moher, David
- Contributor
-
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s12916-020-01566-1
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2020072616124490353418
- Rights
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
14.08.2025, 10:55 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Cukier, Samantha
- Helal, Lucas
- Rice, Danielle B.
- Pupkaite, Justina
- Ahmadzai, Nadera
- Wilson, Mitchell
- Skidmore, Becky
- Lalu, Manoj M.
- Moher, David
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals
Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors'
Randomized trials published in some Chinese journals: how many are randomized?
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
Happy birthday: we are one year old
Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials
Establishing a new journal for systematic review products
All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals
Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors'
Randomized trials published in some Chinese journals: how many are randomized?
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
Happy birthday: we are one year old
Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials
Establishing a new journal for systematic review products
All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals
Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors'
Randomized trials published in some Chinese journals: how many are randomized?
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
Happy birthday: we are one year old
Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials
Establishing a new journal for systematic review products