Artikel

Subsidizing unit donations: matches, rebates, and discounts compared

An influential result in the literature on charitable giving is that matching subsidies dominate rebate subsidies in raising funds. We investigate whether this result extends to "unit donation" schemes, a popular alternative form of soliciting donations. There, the donors' choices are over the number of units of a charitable good to fund at a given unit price, rather than the amount of money to give. Comparing matches and rebates as well as simple discounts on the unit price, we find no evidence of dominance in our online experiment: the three subsidy types are equally effective overall. At a more disaggregated level, rebates lead to a higher likelihood of giving, while matching and discount subsidies lead to larger donations by donors. This suggests that charities using a unit donation scheme enjoy additional degrees of freedom in choosing a subsidy type. Rebates merit additional consideration if the primary goal is to attract donors.

Sprache
Englisch

Erschienen in
Journal: Experimental Economics ; ISSN: 1573-6938 ; Volume: 25 ; Year: 2021 ; Issue: 2 ; Pages: 734-758 ; New York, NY: Springer US

Klassifikation
Wirtschaft
Field Experiments
Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
Altruism; Philanthropy; Intergenerational Transfers
Personal Income and Other Nonbusiness Taxes and Subsidies; includes inheritance and gift taxes
Public Goods
Nonprofit Institutions; NGOs; Social Entrepreneurship
Thema
Charitable giving
Unit donation
Subsidies
Online field experiment
Framing

Ereignis
Geistige Schöpfung
(wer)
Diederich, Johannes
Eckel, Catherine C.
Epperson, Raphael
Goeschl, Timo
Grossman, Philip J.
Ereignis
Veröffentlichung
(wer)
Springer US
(wo)
New York, NY
(wann)
2021

DOI
doi:10.1007/s10683-021-09732-9
Letzte Aktualisierung
10.03.2025, 11:42 MEZ

Datenpartner

Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.

Objekttyp

  • Artikel

Beteiligte

  • Diederich, Johannes
  • Eckel, Catherine C.
  • Epperson, Raphael
  • Goeschl, Timo
  • Grossman, Philip J.
  • Springer US

Entstanden

  • 2021

Ähnliche Objekte (12)