Arbeitspapier

Subsidizing unit donations: Matches, rebates, and discounts compared

An influential result in the literature on charitable giving is that matching subsidies dominate rebate subsidies in raising funds. We investigate whether this result extends to 'unit donation' schemes, a popular alternative form of soliciting donations. There, the donors' choices are about the number of units of a charitable good to fund at a given unit price, rather than the amount of money to give. Comparing matches and rebates as well as simple discounts on the unit price, we find no evidence of dominance in our online experiment: The three subsidy types are equally effective overall. At a more disaggregate level, rebates lead to a higher likelihood of giving while matching and discount subsidies lead to larger donations by donors. This suggests that charities using a unit donation scheme enjoy additional degrees of freedom in choosing a subsidy type. Rebates merit additional consideration if the primary goal is to attract donors.

Language
Englisch

Bibliographic citation
Series: AWI Discussion Paper Series ; No. 697

Classification
Wirtschaft
Field Experiments
Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
Altruism; Philanthropy; Intergenerational Transfers
Personal Income and Other Nonbusiness Taxes and Subsidies; includes inheritance and gift taxes
Public Goods
Nonprofit Institutions; NGOs; Social Entrepreneurship
Subject
Charitable giving
unit donation
subsidies
online field experiment
framing

Event
Geistige Schöpfung
(who)
Diederich, Johannes
Eckel, Catherine C.
Epperson, Raphael
Goeschl, Timo
Grossman, Philip Johnson
Event
Veröffentlichung
(who)
University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics
(where)
Heidelberg
(when)
2020

DOI
doi:10.11588/heidok.00029236
Handle
URN
urn:nbn:de:bsz:16-heidok-292365
Last update
10.03.2025, 11:42 AM CET

Data provider

This object is provided by:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Object type

  • Arbeitspapier

Associated

  • Diederich, Johannes
  • Eckel, Catherine C.
  • Epperson, Raphael
  • Goeschl, Timo
  • Grossman, Philip Johnson
  • University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics

Time of origin

  • 2020

Other Objects (12)