Arbeitspapier

Role induced bias in court: An experimental analysis

Criminal procedure is organized as a tournament with predefined roles. We show that assuming the role of a defense counsel or prosecutor leads to role induced bias even if people are highly motivated to give unbiased judgments. In line with parallel constraint satisfaction models for legal decision making, findings indicate that role induced bias is driven by coherence effects (Simon, 2004), that is, systematic information distortions in support of the favored option. These distortions seem to stabilize interpretations, and people do not correct for this bias. Implications for legal procedure are briefly discussed.

Sprache
Englisch

Erschienen in
Series: Preprints of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods ; No. 2010,37

Klassifikation
Wirtschaft
Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
Illegal Behavior and the Enforcement of Law
Design of Experiments: Laboratory, Individual
Criminal Law
Thema
parallel constraint satisfaction
intuition
biases
legal decision making
Strafverfahren
Rechtsprechung
Soziale Rolle
Bias
Test

Ereignis
Geistige Schöpfung
(wer)
Glöckner, Andreas
Engel, Christoph
Ereignis
Veröffentlichung
(wer)
Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
(wo)
Bonn
(wann)
2010

Handle
Letzte Aktualisierung
10.03.2025, 11:44 MEZ

Datenpartner

Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.

Objekttyp

  • Arbeitspapier

Beteiligte

  • Glöckner, Andreas
  • Engel, Christoph
  • Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods

Entstanden

  • 2010

Ähnliche Objekte (12)