Arbeitspapier
Does efficiency Trump legality? The case of the German Constitutional Court
The US Supreme Court has the power of certiorari. It may pick its fights. As a beneficial side effect, the court may allocate its resources, in particular the time and energy the justices spend on a case, to worthy causes. In economic parlance, this discretion makes the court more efficient. Efficiency comes at a political cost, though. This discretion also gives the court political power. It may direct its verdict to causes that are politically most relevant, or it may put an issue on the political agenda. Officially German constitutional law does not have certiorari. The Constitutional Court must decide each and every case that is brought. Yet over time the court has crafted a whole arsenal of more subtle measures for managing the case load. This paper shows that it uses these tools to engage in its version of allocating resources to cases. It investigates whether the ensuing efficiency gain comes at the cost of biasing the court's jurisprudence. The paper exploits a new comprehensive data set. It consists of all (mostly only electronically) published cases the court has heard in 2011. While the data is rich, in many technical ways it is demanding. The paper uses a factor analysis to create a latent variable: to which degree has the court taken an individual case seriously? It then investigates whether observed indicators for bias explain this latent variable. Since the paper essentially investigates a single (independent) case, in statistical terms the findings are to be interpreted with caution. The paper can only aim at finding smoking guns.
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Erschienen in
-
Series: Preprints of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods ; No. 2017/20
- Klassifikation
-
Wirtschaft
Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General
Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Microeconomic Data; Data Access
Bureaucracy; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations; Corruption
Positive Analysis of Policy Formulation and Implementation
Structure, Scope, and Performance of Government
Litigation Process
- Thema
-
German Constitutional Court
Efficiency
Case Load
Discretion
Bias
- Ereignis
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (wer)
-
Engel, Christoph
- Ereignis
-
Veröffentlichung
- (wer)
-
Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
- (wo)
-
Bonn
- (wann)
-
2017
- Handle
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
10.03.2025, 11:42 MEZ
Datenpartner
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Objekttyp
- Arbeitspapier
Beteiligte
- Engel, Christoph
- Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
Entstanden
- 2017
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
The Constitutional Court - applying the proportionality principle - as a subsidiary authority for the assessment of political outcomes
Delineating the proper scope of government: A proper task for a constitutional court?
A constitutional framework for private governance
Lucky You: Your Case is Heard by a Seasoned Panel - Panel Effects in the German Constitutional Court
Hybrid Governance Across National Jurisdictions as a Challenge to Constitutional Law
Governing the egalitarians from without: The case of the internet
The role of law in the governance of the internet
The Internet and the Nation State
Neglect the base rate: It's the law!
Learning the Law
The solidarity motive
The behaviour of corporate actors: a survey of the empirical literature
The Constitutional Court - applying the proportionality principle - as a subsidiary authority for the assessment of political outcomes
Delineating the proper scope of government: A proper task for a constitutional court?
A constitutional framework for private governance
Lucky You: Your Case is Heard by a Seasoned Panel - Panel Effects in the German Constitutional Court
Hybrid Governance Across National Jurisdictions as a Challenge to Constitutional Law
Governing the egalitarians from without: The case of the internet
The role of law in the governance of the internet
The Internet and the Nation State
Neglect the base rate: It's the law!
Learning the Law
The solidarity motive
The behaviour of corporate actors: a survey of the empirical literature
The Constitutional Court - applying the proportionality principle - as a subsidiary authority for the assessment of political outcomes
Delineating the proper scope of government: A proper task for a constitutional court?
A constitutional framework for private governance
Lucky You: Your Case is Heard by a Seasoned Panel - Panel Effects in the German Constitutional Court
Hybrid Governance Across National Jurisdictions as a Challenge to Constitutional Law
Governing the egalitarians from without: The case of the internet
The role of law in the governance of the internet
The Internet and the Nation State
Neglect the base rate: It's the law!
Learning the Law
The solidarity motive