Arbeitspapier
Judicial decision-making a survey of the experimental evidence
Judges are human beings. Is their behavior therefore subject to the same effects that psychology and behavioral economics have documented for convenience samples, like university students? Does that fact that they decide on behalf of third parties moderate their behavior? In which ways does the need matter to find a solution when the evidence is inconclusive and contested? How do the multiple institutional safeguards resulting from procedural law, and the ways how the parties use it, affect judicial decision-making? Many of these questions have been put to the experimental test. The paper provides a systematic overview of the rich evidence, points out gaps that still exist, and discusses methodological challenges.
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Erschienen in
-
Series: Discussion Papers of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods ; No. 2022/6
- Klassifikation
-
Wirtschaft
Basic Areas of Law: General (Constitutional Law)
Tort Law and Product Liability; Forensic Economics
Criminal Law
- Thema
-
judicial decision-making
bias
heuristic
attitudinal model
ambiguity
parallel con-straint satisfaction
public perception
- Ereignis
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (wer)
-
Engel, Christoph
- Ereignis
-
Veröffentlichung
- (wer)
-
Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
- (wo)
-
Bonn
- (wann)
-
2022
- Handle
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
10.03.2025, 11:44 MEZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Objekttyp
- Arbeitspapier
Beteiligte
- Engel, Christoph
- Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
Entstanden
- 2022
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Judicial Decision-Making
Models of multi-attribute decision-making: implications for institutional analysis and design
The Impact of Representation Norms on the Quality of Judicial Decisions
The Law – An Impossible Discipline
You are in charge: Experimentally testing the motivating power of holding a judicial office
The impact of institutions on the decision: how to decide
Behavioral Economics - Enhanced: Machine Learning and Decision Making
Maverick: Making sense of a conjecture of antitrust policy in the lab
Learning the Law
Incentives for process innovation in a collusive duopoly
Hybrid Governance Across National Jurisdictions as a Challenge to Constitutional Law
Competition in a pure world of Internet telephony
Judicial Decision-Making
Models of multi-attribute decision-making: implications for institutional analysis and design
The Impact of Representation Norms on the Quality of Judicial Decisions
The Law – An Impossible Discipline
You are in charge: Experimentally testing the motivating power of holding a judicial office
The impact of institutions on the decision: how to decide
Behavioral Economics - Enhanced: Machine Learning and Decision Making
Maverick: Making sense of a conjecture of antitrust policy in the lab
Learning the Law
Incentives for process innovation in a collusive duopoly
Hybrid Governance Across National Jurisdictions as a Challenge to Constitutional Law
Competition in a pure world of Internet telephony
Judicial Decision-Making
Models of multi-attribute decision-making: implications for institutional analysis and design
The Impact of Representation Norms on the Quality of Judicial Decisions
The Law – An Impossible Discipline
You are in charge: Experimentally testing the motivating power of holding a judicial office
The impact of institutions on the decision: how to decide
Behavioral Economics - Enhanced: Machine Learning and Decision Making
Maverick: Making sense of a conjecture of antitrust policy in the lab
Learning the Law
Incentives for process innovation in a collusive duopoly
Hybrid Governance Across National Jurisdictions as a Challenge to Constitutional Law