Artikel
Reciprocity in locating contributions: Experiments on the neighborhood public good game
In repeated public good experiments, reciprocity helps to sustain high levels of cooperation. Can this be achieved by location choices in addition to making contributions? It is more realistic to rely on an intuitive neighborhood model for community members who interact repeatedly. In our experiments, participants can locate their contribution, yielding a small benefit for the participant, who receives the contribution and a small disadvantage for the participant, at the opposite location. This mechanism of individually targeted sanctions helps to foster initial cooperation. It decreases over time, however. Location choices are used to reciprocate, but may not suffice to stabilize voluntary cooperation as an effect observed in the field.
- Language
-
Englisch
- Bibliographic citation
-
Journal: Games ; ISSN: 2073-4336 ; Volume: 4 ; Year: 2013 ; Issue: 2 ; Pages: 144-162 ; Basel: MDPI
- Classification
-
Wirtschaft
- Subject
-
public good game
neighborhood
cooperation
experimental analysis
- Event
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (who)
-
Berninghaus, Siegfried
Güth, Werner
Schosser, Stephan
- Event
-
Veröffentlichung
- (who)
-
MDPI
- (where)
-
Basel
- (when)
-
2013
- DOI
-
doi:10.3390/g4020144
- Handle
- Last update
-
10.03.2025, 11:44 AM CET
Data provider
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Object type
- Artikel
Associated
- Berninghaus, Siegfried
- Güth, Werner
- Schosser, Stephan
- MDPI
Time of origin
- 2013
Other Objects (12)
Perfect or Bounded Rationality? : Some Facts, Speculations and Proposals
Beyond procedural equity and reciprocity
Purely Procedural Preferences - Beyond Procedural Equity and Reciprocity
Prior-free optimality and satisficing: a common framework and its experimental implementation
Preisregeln für Auktionen und Ausschreibungen
Do banks crowd in or out business ethics? An indirect evolutionary analysis
A non-Bayesian approach to (un)bounded rationality
Rules (of bidding) to generate equal stated profits: An axiomatic approach
Collectively ranking candidates: An axiomatic approach
Robust learning experiments: Evidence for learning and deliberation
How ultimatum offers emerge: A study in bounded rationality
(Non-) behavioral economics: a programmatic assessment
Perfect or Bounded Rationality? : Some Facts, Speculations and Proposals
Beyond procedural equity and reciprocity
Purely Procedural Preferences - Beyond Procedural Equity and Reciprocity
Prior-free optimality and satisficing: a common framework and its experimental implementation
Preisregeln für Auktionen und Ausschreibungen
Do banks crowd in or out business ethics? An indirect evolutionary analysis
A non-Bayesian approach to (un)bounded rationality
Rules (of bidding) to generate equal stated profits: An axiomatic approach
Collectively ranking candidates: An axiomatic approach
Robust learning experiments: Evidence for learning and deliberation
How ultimatum offers emerge: A study in bounded rationality
(Non-) behavioral economics: a programmatic assessment
Perfect or Bounded Rationality? : Some Facts, Speculations and Proposals
Beyond procedural equity and reciprocity
Purely Procedural Preferences - Beyond Procedural Equity and Reciprocity
Prior-free optimality and satisficing: a common framework and its experimental implementation
Preisregeln für Auktionen und Ausschreibungen
Do banks crowd in or out business ethics? An indirect evolutionary analysis
A non-Bayesian approach to (un)bounded rationality
Rules (of bidding) to generate equal stated profits: An axiomatic approach
Collectively ranking candidates: An axiomatic approach
Robust learning experiments: Evidence for learning and deliberation
How ultimatum offers emerge: A study in bounded rationality