A mixed-methods survey and focus group study to understand researcher and clinician preferences for a Journal transparency Tool
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- Umfang
-
1 Online-Ressource.
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Erschienen in
-
A mixed-methods survey and focus group study to understand researcher and clinician preferences for a Journal transparency Tool ; volume:14 ; number:1 ; day:4 ; month:11 ; year:2024 ; pages:1-12 ; date:12.2024
Scientific reports ; 14, Heft 1 (4.11.2024), 1-12, 12.2024
- Urheber
-
Ng, Jeremy
Liu, Henry
Masood, Mehvish
Kochhar, Jassimar
Moher, David
Ehrlich, Alan
Iorio, Alfonso
Cobey, Kelly D.
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
-
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1038/s41598-024-77790-z
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2501222117437.052393022761
- Rechteinformation
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
15.08.2025, 07:31 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Ng, Jeremy
- Liu, Henry
- Masood, Mehvish
- Kochhar, Jassimar
- Moher, David
- Ehrlich, Alan
- Iorio, Alfonso
- Cobey, Kelly D.
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials
Happy birthday: we are one year old
All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more
Developing a guideline for clinical trial protocol content: Delphi consensus survey
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2014
Reflections and aspirations: the journal after 5 years
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials
Happy birthday: we are one year old
All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more
Developing a guideline for clinical trial protocol content: Delphi consensus survey
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2014
Reflections and aspirations: the journal after 5 years
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials
Happy birthday: we are one year old
All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more
Developing a guideline for clinical trial protocol content: Delphi consensus survey
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2014