Face-to-face versus distance learning of basic suturing skills in novice learners: a quantitative prospective randomized trial
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1472-6920
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Notes
-
online resource.
- Bibliographic citation
-
Face-to-face versus distance learning of basic suturing skills in novice learners: a quantitative prospective randomized trial ; volume:22 ; number:1 ; day:18 ; month:4 ; year:2022 ; pages:1-18 ; date:12.2022
BMC medical education ; 22, Heft 1 (18.4.2022), 1-18, 12.2022
- Classification
-
Erziehung, Schul- und Bildungswesen
- Creator
-
Zaghal, Ahmad
Marley, Charles
Rahhal, Salim
Hassanieh, Joelle
Saadeh, Rami
El-Rifai, Arwa
Qaraqe, Taha
ElBejjani, Martine
Jaafar, Rola
Hoballah, Jamal J.
- Contributor
-
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s12909-022-03353-3
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2022070208293388210776
- Rights
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
15.08.2025, 7:37 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Zaghal, Ahmad
- Marley, Charles
- Rahhal, Salim
- Hassanieh, Joelle
- Saadeh, Rami
- El-Rifai, Arwa
- Qaraqe, Taha
- ElBejjani, Martine
- Jaafar, Rola
- Hoballah, Jamal J.
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
Learners’ beliefs about language-learning abilities in face-to-face & online settings
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior
On the duration of face-to-face contacts
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Documentation of Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 1.0)
Understanding technology use in face-to-face interaction
Learners’ beliefs about language-learning abilities in face-to-face & online settings
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior
On the duration of face-to-face contacts
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Documentation of Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 1.0)
Understanding technology use in face-to-face interaction
Learners’ beliefs about language-learning abilities in face-to-face & online settings
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior
On the duration of face-to-face contacts
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Documentation of Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 1.0)