- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- Umfang
-
1 Online-Ressource.
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Erschienen in
-
On the duration of face-to-face contacts ; volume:13 ; number:1 ; day:10 ; month:1 ; year:2024 ; pages:1-15 ; date:12.2024
EPJ Data Science ; 13, Heft 1 (10.1.2024), 1-15, 12.2024
- Urheber
-
Plaszczynski, Stéphane
Nakamura, Gilberto
Grammaticos, Basile
Badoual, Mathilde
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
-
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1140/epjds/s13688-023-00444-z
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2024032510141014621421
- Rechteinformation
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
14.08.2025, 10:44 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Plaszczynski, Stéphane
- Nakamura, Gilberto
- Grammaticos, Basile
- Badoual, Mathilde
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Can co-location be used as a proxy for face-to-face contacts?
Can co-location be used as a proxy for face-to-face contacts?
Substituting face-to-face contacts in academics’ collaborations: modern communication tools, proximity, and brokerage
Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Understanding technology use in face-to-face interaction
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Can co-location be used as a proxy for face-to-face contacts?
Can co-location be used as a proxy for face-to-face contacts?
Substituting face-to-face contacts in academics’ collaborations: modern communication tools, proximity, and brokerage
Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Understanding technology use in face-to-face interaction
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Can co-location be used as a proxy for face-to-face contacts?
Can co-location be used as a proxy for face-to-face contacts?
Substituting face-to-face contacts in academics’ collaborations: modern communication tools, proximity, and brokerage
Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?