Face-to-face versus distance learning of basic suturing skills in novice learners: a quantitative prospective randomized trial
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1472-6920
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
online resource.
- Erschienen in
-
Face-to-face versus distance learning of basic suturing skills in novice learners: a quantitative prospective randomized trial ; volume:22 ; number:1 ; day:18 ; month:4 ; year:2022 ; pages:1-18 ; date:12.2022
BMC medical education ; 22, Heft 1 (18.4.2022), 1-18, 12.2022
- Klassifikation
-
Erziehung, Schul- und Bildungswesen
- Urheber
-
Zaghal, Ahmad
Marley, Charles
Rahhal, Salim
Hassanieh, Joelle
Saadeh, Rami
El-Rifai, Arwa
Qaraqe, Taha
ElBejjani, Martine
Jaafar, Rola
Hoballah, Jamal J.
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
-
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s12909-022-03353-3
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2022070208293388210776
- Rechteinformation
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
15.08.2025, 07:37 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Zaghal, Ahmad
- Marley, Charles
- Rahhal, Salim
- Hassanieh, Joelle
- Saadeh, Rami
- El-Rifai, Arwa
- Qaraqe, Taha
- ElBejjani, Martine
- Jaafar, Rola
- Hoballah, Jamal J.
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Learners’ beliefs about language-learning abilities in face-to-face & online settings
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior
On the duration of face-to-face contacts
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Understanding technology use in face-to-face interaction
Documentation of Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 1.0)
Learners’ beliefs about language-learning abilities in face-to-face & online settings
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior
On the duration of face-to-face contacts
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Understanding technology use in face-to-face interaction
Documentation of Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 1.0)
Learners’ beliefs about language-learning abilities in face-to-face & online settings
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior
On the duration of face-to-face contacts
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Understanding technology use in face-to-face interaction