Addressing overuse of health services in health systems: a critical interpretive synthesis
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1478-4505
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
online resource.
- Erschienen in
-
Addressing overuse of health services in health systems: a critical interpretive synthesis ; volume:16 ; number:1 ; day:15 ; month:6 ; year:2018 ; pages:1-14 ; date:12.2018
Health research policy and systems ; 16, Heft 1 (15.6.2018), 1-14, 12.2018
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
-
Ellen, Moriah E.
Wilson, Michael G.
Vélez, Marcela
Shach, Ruth
Lavis, John N.
Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
Moat, Kaelan A.
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s12961-018-0325-x
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2018082420025557611697
- Rechteinformation
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
15.08.2025, 07:20 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Ellen, Moriah E.
- Wilson, Michael G.
- Vélez, Marcela
- Shach, Ruth
- Lavis, John N.
- Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
- Moat, Kaelan A.
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Changing behaviour ‘more or less’—do theories of behaviour inform strategies for implementation and de-implementation? A critical interpretive synthesis
AIMD - a validated, simplified framework of interventions to promote and integrate evidence into health practices, systems, and policies
Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?
Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent
Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported
Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014
A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015
Are multifaceted interventions more effective than single-component interventions in changing health-care professionals' behaviours? An overview of systematic reviews
Use of communities of practice in business and health care sectors: A systematic review
What supports do health system organizations have in place to facilitate evidence-informed decision-making? a qualitative study
Changing behaviour ‘more or less’—do theories of behaviour inform strategies for implementation and de-implementation? A critical interpretive synthesis
AIMD - a validated, simplified framework of interventions to promote and integrate evidence into health practices, systems, and policies
Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?
Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent
Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported
Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014
A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015
Are multifaceted interventions more effective than single-component interventions in changing health-care professionals' behaviours? An overview of systematic reviews
Use of communities of practice in business and health care sectors: A systematic review
What supports do health system organizations have in place to facilitate evidence-informed decision-making? a qualitative study
Changing behaviour ‘more or less’—do theories of behaviour inform strategies for implementation and de-implementation? A critical interpretive synthesis
AIMD - a validated, simplified framework of interventions to promote and integrate evidence into health practices, systems, and policies
Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?
Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent
Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported
Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014
A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015
Are multifaceted interventions more effective than single-component interventions in changing health-care professionals' behaviours? An overview of systematic reviews
Use of communities of practice in business and health care sectors: A systematic review