Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?

to related objects

Location: Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main

ISSN: 1748-5908

Extent: Online-Ressource

Language: Englisch

Notes: online resource.

Bibliographic citation: Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare? ; volume:7 ; number:1 ; day:29 ; month:2 ; year:2012 ; pages:1-4 ; date:12.2012
Implementation science ; 7, Heft 1 (29.2.2012), 1-4, 12.2012

Creator: Wensing, Michel

Contributor: Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
Eccles, Martin P.
SpringerLink (Online service)

DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-10

URN: urn:nbn:de:1111-2016070922583

Rights: Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.

Last update: 14.08.2025, 10:44 AM CEST

Data provider

This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Show original at data provider

Associated

Wensing, Michel
Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
Eccles, Martin P.
SpringerLink (Online service)

Other Objects (12)

Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method

Lead editorial: Trials – using the opportunities of electronic publishing to improve the reporting of randomised trials

Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent

A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations

Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?

Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015

Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?

How can we improve guideline use? A conceptual framework of implementability

Methods for designing interventions to change healthcare professionals’ behaviour: a systematic review

Are multifaceted interventions more effective than single-component interventions in changing health-care professionals' behaviours? An overview of systematic reviews

Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method

Lead editorial: Trials – using the opportunities of electronic publishing to improve the reporting of randomised trials

Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent

A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations

Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?

Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015

Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?

How can we improve guideline use? A conceptual framework of implementability

Methods for designing interventions to change healthcare professionals’ behaviour: a systematic review

Are multifaceted interventions more effective than single-component interventions in changing health-care professionals' behaviours? An overview of systematic reviews

Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method

Lead editorial: Trials – using the opportunities of electronic publishing to improve the reporting of randomised trials

Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent

A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations

Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?

Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015

Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?

How can we improve guideline use? A conceptual framework of implementability

Methods for designing interventions to change healthcare professionals’ behaviour: a systematic review

Are multifaceted interventions more effective than single-component interventions in changing health-care professionals' behaviours? An overview of systematic reviews

Cultural heritage institutions wishing to register will find more information here.

Fields marked * need to be filled in.

Username*

Please enter your username

Email*

Please enter your email address

Please do not fill this field

First name

Last name

Password*

Please enter your password

Confirm password*

Please enter the same password

I have read the terms of use and the privacy policy for the collection of personal data and accept them. *

This field is required.

I would like to subscribe to the newsletter of the Deutsche Digitale Bibliothek. See newsletter subscription info.

Account created

Your "My DDB" account has been successfully created. Before you can log in to your account, you must click the confirmation link in the message we just sent to the email address you provided.

Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?

Object Details

References and Relationships

Contributors, Places and Time

Further information

Data provider

Associated

Other Objects (12)

Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method

Lead editorial: Trials – using the opportunities of electronic publishing to improve the reporting of randomised trials

Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent

A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations

Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?

Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015

Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?

How can we improve guideline use? A conceptual framework of implementability

Methods for designing interventions to change healthcare professionals’ behaviour: a systematic review

Are multifaceted interventions more effective than single-component interventions in changing health-care professionals' behaviours? An overview of systematic reviews

Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method

Lead editorial: Trials – using the opportunities of electronic publishing to improve the reporting of randomised trials

Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent

A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations

Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?

Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015

Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?

How can we improve guideline use? A conceptual framework of implementability

Methods for designing interventions to change healthcare professionals’ behaviour: a systematic review

Are multifaceted interventions more effective than single-component interventions in changing health-care professionals' behaviours? An overview of systematic reviews

Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method

Lead editorial: Trials – using the opportunities of electronic publishing to improve the reporting of randomised trials

Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent

A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations

Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?

Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015

Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?

How can we improve guideline use? A conceptual framework of implementability

Methods for designing interventions to change healthcare professionals’ behaviour: a systematic review

Are multifaceted interventions more effective than single-component interventions in changing health-care professionals' behaviours? An overview of systematic reviews

Related objects

Reset password