Use of communities of practice in business and health care sectors: A systematic review
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1748-5908
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
online resource.
- Erschienen in
-
Use of communities of practice in business and health care sectors: A systematic review ; volume:4 ; number:1 ; day:17 ; month:5 ; year:2009 ; pages:1-9 ; date:12.2009
Implementation science ; 4, Heft 1 (17.5.2009), 1-9, 12.2009
- Urheber
-
Li, Linda C.
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
-
Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
Nielsen, Camilla
Judd, Maria
Coyte, Peter C.
Graham, Ian D.
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/1748-5908-4-27
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-2016070918811
- Rechteinformation
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
14.08.2025, 10:51 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Li, Linda C.
- Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
- Nielsen, Camilla
- Judd, Maria
- Coyte, Peter C.
- Graham, Ian D.
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations
Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent
Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?
Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014
Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015
Lead editorial: Trials – using the opportunities of electronic publishing to improve the reporting of randomised trials
What is the role of randomised trials in implementation science?
Linked publications from a single trial: a thread of evidence
Trialists perspectives on sustaining, spreading, and scaling-up of quality improvement interventions
AIMD - a validated, simplified framework of interventions to promote and integrate evidence into health practices, systems, and policies
A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations
Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent
Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?
Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014
Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015
Lead editorial: Trials – using the opportunities of electronic publishing to improve the reporting of randomised trials
What is the role of randomised trials in implementation science?
Linked publications from a single trial: a thread of evidence
Trialists perspectives on sustaining, spreading, and scaling-up of quality improvement interventions
AIMD - a validated, simplified framework of interventions to promote and integrate evidence into health practices, systems, and policies
A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations
Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent
Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?
Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014
Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015
Lead editorial: Trials – using the opportunities of electronic publishing to improve the reporting of randomised trials
What is the role of randomised trials in implementation science?
Linked publications from a single trial: a thread of evidence
Trialists perspectives on sustaining, spreading, and scaling-up of quality improvement interventions