Arbeitspapier

Self-Selection into Economics Experiments Is Driven by Monetary Rewards

Laboratory experiments have become a wide-spread tool in economic research. Yet, there is still doubt about how well the results from lab experiments generalize to other settings. In this paper, we investigate the self-selection process of potential subjects into the subject pool. We alter the recruitment email sent to first-year students, either mentioning the monetary reward associated with participation in experiments; or appealing to the importance of helping research; or both. We find that the sign-up rate drops by two-thirds if we do not mention monetary rewards. Appealing to subjects' willingness to help research has no effect on sign-up. We then invite the so-recruited subjects to the laboratory to measure a range of preferences in incentivized experiments. We do not find any differences between the three groups. Our results show that student subjects participate in experiments foremost to earn money, and that it is therefore unlikely that this selection leads to an over-estimation of social preferences in the student population.

Language
Englisch

Bibliographic citation
Series: IZA Discussion Papers ; No. 7374

Classification
Wirtschaft
Design of Experiments: General
Subject
methodology
selection bias
laboratory experiment
field experiment
other-regarding behavior
social preferences
social approval
experimenter demand

Event
Geistige Schöpfung
(who)
Abeler, Johannes
Nosenzo, Daniele
Event
Veröffentlichung
(who)
Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)
(where)
Bonn
(when)
2013

Handle
Last update
10.03.2025, 11:42 AM CET

Data provider

This object is provided by:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Object type

  • Arbeitspapier

Associated

  • Abeler, Johannes
  • Nosenzo, Daniele
  • Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)

Time of origin

  • 2013

Other Objects (12)