Arbeitspapier

Hurting hurts more than Helping helps: The Role of the Self-serving Bias

This paper investigates an implication of the self-serving bias for reciprocalresponses. It is hypothesized that negative intentionality matters more thanpositive intentionality for reciprocating individuals with a self-servingattributional style. Experimental evidence obtained in the hot response gamesupports this prediction. Subjects are 67% more likely to reciprocate anintentional hurtful choice over an unintentional hurtful choice. Subjects areonly 25% more likely to reciprocate an intentional helpful choice over anunintentional helpful choice. The evidence on the intermediating role ofemotions is consistent with the explanation offered by the self-serving bias.

Language
Englisch

Bibliographic citation
Series: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper ; No. 99-018/1

Classification
Wirtschaft
Game Theory and Bargaining Theory: General
Design of Experiments: Laboratory, Group Behavior
Subject
reciprocity
intentionality
self-serving bias
experiment
Spieltheorie
Nutzen
Theorie

Event
Geistige Schöpfung
(who)
Offerman, Theo
Event
Veröffentlichung
(who)
Tinbergen Institute
(where)
Amsterdam and Rotterdam
(when)
1999

Handle
Last update
10.03.2025, 11:42 AM CET

Data provider

This object is provided by:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Object type

  • Arbeitspapier

Associated

  • Offerman, Theo
  • Tinbergen Institute

Time of origin

  • 1999

Other Objects (12)