Field Experimental Evidence on Gender Discrimination in Hiring: Biased as Heckman and Siegelman Predicted?

Abstract: Correspondence studies are nowadays viewed as the most compelling avenue to test for hiring discrimination. However, these studies suffer from one fundamental methodological problem, as formulated by Heckman and Siegelman (The Urban Institute audit studies: Their methods and findings. In M. Fix, and R. Struyk (Eds.), Clear and convincing evidence: Measurement of discrimination in America, 1993), namely the bias in their results in case of group differences in the variance of unobserved determinants of hiring outcomes. In this study, the authors empirically investigate this bias in the context of gender discrimination. The authors do not find significant evidence for the feared bias.

Location
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
Extent
Online-Ressource
Language
Englisch

Bibliographic citation
Field Experimental Evidence on Gender Discrimination in Hiring: Biased as Heckman and Siegelman Predicted? ; volume:9 ; number:1 ; year:2015 ; extent:13
Economics / Journal articles. Journal articles ; 9, Heft 1 (2015) (gesamt 13)

Creator
Baert, Stijn

DOI
10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2015-25
URN
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2412130950107.311107942124
Rights
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
Last update
15.08.2025, 7:30 AM CEST

Data provider

This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Associated

  • Baert, Stijn

Other Objects (12)