Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1748-5908
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
online resource.
- Erschienen in
-
Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare? ; volume:7 ; number:1 ; day:29 ; month:2 ; year:2012 ; pages:1-4 ; date:12.2012
Implementation science ; 7, Heft 1 (29.2.2012), 1-4, 12.2012
- Urheber
-
Wensing, Michel
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
-
Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
Eccles, Martin P.
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/1748-5908-7-10
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-2016070922583
- Rechteinformation
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
14.08.2025, 10:44 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Wensing, Michel
- Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
- Eccles, Martin P.
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method
Lead editorial: Trials – using the opportunities of electronic publishing to improve the reporting of randomised trials
Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?
How can we improve guideline use? A conceptual framework of implementability
A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations
Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent
Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014
Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015
Methods for designing interventions to change healthcare professionals’ behaviour: a systematic review
Are multifaceted interventions more effective than single-component interventions in changing health-care professionals' behaviours? An overview of systematic reviews
Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method
Lead editorial: Trials – using the opportunities of electronic publishing to improve the reporting of randomised trials
Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?
How can we improve guideline use? A conceptual framework of implementability
A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations
Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent
Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014
Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015
Methods for designing interventions to change healthcare professionals’ behaviour: a systematic review
Are multifaceted interventions more effective than single-component interventions in changing health-care professionals' behaviours? An overview of systematic reviews
Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method
Lead editorial: Trials – using the opportunities of electronic publishing to improve the reporting of randomised trials
Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?
How can we improve guideline use? A conceptual framework of implementability
A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations
Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent
Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014
Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015
Methods for designing interventions to change healthcare professionals’ behaviour: a systematic review