Methods for designing interventions to change healthcare professionals’ behaviour: a systematic review

to related objects

Location: Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main

ISSN: 1748-5908

Extent: Online-Ressource

Language: Englisch

Notes: online resource.

Bibliographic citation: Methods for designing interventions to change healthcare professionals’ behaviour: a systematic review ; volume:12 ; number:1 ; day:4 ; month:3 ; year:2017 ; pages:1-11 ; date:12.2017
Implementation science ; 12, Heft 1 (4.3.2017), 1-11, 12.2017

Keyword: Hautkrankheit
Dermatologie

Creator: Colquhoun, Heather L.

Contributor: Squires, Janet E.
Kolehmainen, Niina
Fraser, Cynthia
Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
SpringerLink (Online service)

DOI: 10.1186/s13012-017-0560-5

URN: urn:nbn:de:1111-201703258770

Rights: Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.

Last update: 14.08.2025, 10:57 AM CEST

Data provider

This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Show original at data provider

Associated

Colquhoun, Heather L.
Squires, Janet E.
Kolehmainen, Niina
Fraser, Cynthia
Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
SpringerLink (Online service)

Other Objects (12)

Are multifaceted interventions more effective than single-component interventions in changing health-care professionals' behaviours? An overview of systematic reviews

Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?

Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?

Trialists perspectives on sustaining, spreading, and scaling-up of quality improvement interventions

Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method

AIMD - a validated, simplified framework of interventions to promote and integrate evidence into health practices, systems, and policies

Advancing the literature on designing audit and feedback interventions: identifying theory-informed hypotheses

Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent

Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014

A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015

Are multifaceted interventions more effective than single-component interventions in changing health-care professionals' behaviours? An overview of systematic reviews

Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?

Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?

Trialists perspectives on sustaining, spreading, and scaling-up of quality improvement interventions

Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method

AIMD - a validated, simplified framework of interventions to promote and integrate evidence into health practices, systems, and policies

Advancing the literature on designing audit and feedback interventions: identifying theory-informed hypotheses

Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent

Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014

A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015

Are multifaceted interventions more effective than single-component interventions in changing health-care professionals' behaviours? An overview of systematic reviews

Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?

Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?

Trialists perspectives on sustaining, spreading, and scaling-up of quality improvement interventions

Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method

AIMD - a validated, simplified framework of interventions to promote and integrate evidence into health practices, systems, and policies

Advancing the literature on designing audit and feedback interventions: identifying theory-informed hypotheses

Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent

Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014

A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015

Cultural heritage institutions wishing to register will find more information here.

Fields marked * need to be filled in.

Username*

Please enter your username

Email*

Please enter your email address

Please do not fill this field

First name

Last name

Password*

Please enter your password

Confirm password*

Please enter the same password

I have read the terms of use and the privacy policy for the collection of personal data and accept them. *

This field is required.

I would like to subscribe to the newsletter of the Deutsche Digitale Bibliothek. See newsletter subscription info.

Account created

Your "My DDB" account has been successfully created. Before you can log in to your account, you must click the confirmation link in the message we just sent to the email address you provided.

Methods for designing interventions to change healthcare professionals’ behaviour: a systematic review

Object Details

References and Relationships

Classification and Topics

Contributors, Places and Time

Further information

Data provider

Associated

Other Objects (12)

Are multifaceted interventions more effective than single-component interventions in changing health-care professionals' behaviours? An overview of systematic reviews

Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?

Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?

Trialists perspectives on sustaining, spreading, and scaling-up of quality improvement interventions

Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method

AIMD - a validated, simplified framework of interventions to promote and integrate evidence into health practices, systems, and policies

Advancing the literature on designing audit and feedback interventions: identifying theory-informed hypotheses

Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent

Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014

A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015

Are multifaceted interventions more effective than single-component interventions in changing health-care professionals' behaviours? An overview of systematic reviews

Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?

Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?

Trialists perspectives on sustaining, spreading, and scaling-up of quality improvement interventions

Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method

AIMD - a validated, simplified framework of interventions to promote and integrate evidence into health practices, systems, and policies

Advancing the literature on designing audit and feedback interventions: identifying theory-informed hypotheses

Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent

Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014

A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015

Are multifaceted interventions more effective than single-component interventions in changing health-care professionals' behaviours? An overview of systematic reviews

Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?

Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?

Trialists perspectives on sustaining, spreading, and scaling-up of quality improvement interventions

Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method

AIMD - a validated, simplified framework of interventions to promote and integrate evidence into health practices, systems, and policies

Advancing the literature on designing audit and feedback interventions: identifying theory-informed hypotheses

Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent

Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014

A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015

Related objects

Reset password