Methods for designing interventions to change healthcare professionals’ behaviour: a systematic review
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1748-5908
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
online resource.
- Erschienen in
-
Methods for designing interventions to change healthcare professionals’ behaviour: a systematic review ; volume:12 ; number:1 ; day:4 ; month:3 ; year:2017 ; pages:1-11 ; date:12.2017
Implementation science ; 12, Heft 1 (4.3.2017), 1-11, 12.2017
- Schlagwort
-
Hautkrankheit
Dermatologie
- Urheber
-
Colquhoun, Heather L.
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
-
Squires, Janet E.
Kolehmainen, Niina
Fraser, Cynthia
Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s13012-017-0560-5
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-201703258770
- Rechteinformation
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
14.08.2025, 10:57 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Colquhoun, Heather L.
- Squires, Janet E.
- Kolehmainen, Niina
- Fraser, Cynthia
- Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?
Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method
Are multifaceted interventions more effective than single-component interventions in changing health-care professionals' behaviours? An overview of systematic reviews
Changing behaviour ‘more or less’—do theories of behaviour inform strategies for implementation and de-implementation? A critical interpretive synthesis
Trialists perspectives on sustaining, spreading, and scaling-up of quality improvement interventions
AIMD - a validated, simplified framework of interventions to promote and integrate evidence into health practices, systems, and policies
Using a behaviour change techniques taxonomy to identify active ingredients within trials of implementation interventions for diabetes care
Advancing the literature on designing audit and feedback interventions: identifying theory-informed hypotheses
A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations
Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent
Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014
Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?
Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method
Are multifaceted interventions more effective than single-component interventions in changing health-care professionals' behaviours? An overview of systematic reviews
Changing behaviour ‘more or less’—do theories of behaviour inform strategies for implementation and de-implementation? A critical interpretive synthesis
Trialists perspectives on sustaining, spreading, and scaling-up of quality improvement interventions
AIMD - a validated, simplified framework of interventions to promote and integrate evidence into health practices, systems, and policies
Using a behaviour change techniques taxonomy to identify active ingredients within trials of implementation interventions for diabetes care
Advancing the literature on designing audit and feedback interventions: identifying theory-informed hypotheses
A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations
Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent
Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014
Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?
Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method
Are multifaceted interventions more effective than single-component interventions in changing health-care professionals' behaviours? An overview of systematic reviews
Changing behaviour ‘more or less’—do theories of behaviour inform strategies for implementation and de-implementation? A critical interpretive synthesis
Trialists perspectives on sustaining, spreading, and scaling-up of quality improvement interventions
AIMD - a validated, simplified framework of interventions to promote and integrate evidence into health practices, systems, and policies
Using a behaviour change techniques taxonomy to identify active ingredients within trials of implementation interventions for diabetes care
Advancing the literature on designing audit and feedback interventions: identifying theory-informed hypotheses
A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations
Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent
Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?