Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1748-5908
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
online resource.
- Erschienen in
-
Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method ; volume:4 ; number:1 ; day:16 ; month:7 ; year:2009 ; pages:1-6 ; date:12.2009
Implementation science ; 4, Heft 1 (16.7.2009), 1-6, 12.2009
- Urheber
-
Michie, Susan
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
-
Fixsen, Dean
Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
Eccles, Martin P.
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/1748-5908-4-40
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-2016070918271
- Rechteinformation
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
14.08.2025, 10:51 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Michie, Susan
- Fixsen, Dean
- Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
- Eccles, Martin P.
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?
Action, actor, context, target, time (AACTT): a framework for specifying behaviour
Lead editorial: Trials – using the opportunities of electronic publishing to improve the reporting of randomised trials
Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?
A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations
Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent
Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014
Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015
Developing clinical practice guidelines: reviewing, reporting, and publishing guidelines; updating guidelines; and the emerging issues of enhancing guideline implementability and accounting for comorbid conditions in guideline development
SHOW ME the evidence: features of an approach to reliably deliver research evidence to those who need it
Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?
Action, actor, context, target, time (AACTT): a framework for specifying behaviour
Lead editorial: Trials – using the opportunities of electronic publishing to improve the reporting of randomised trials
Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?
A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations
Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent
Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014
Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015
Developing clinical practice guidelines: reviewing, reporting, and publishing guidelines; updating guidelines; and the emerging issues of enhancing guideline implementability and accounting for comorbid conditions in guideline development
SHOW ME the evidence: features of an approach to reliably deliver research evidence to those who need it
Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?
Action, actor, context, target, time (AACTT): a framework for specifying behaviour
Lead editorial: Trials – using the opportunities of electronic publishing to improve the reporting of randomised trials
Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?
A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations
Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent
Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014
Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015
Developing clinical practice guidelines: reviewing, reporting, and publishing guidelines; updating guidelines; and the emerging issues of enhancing guideline implementability and accounting for comorbid conditions in guideline development