Systematic reviews of prognosis studies: a critical appraisal of five core clinical journals
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
2397-7523
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
online resource.
- Erschienen in
-
Systematic reviews of prognosis studies: a critical appraisal of five core clinical journals ; volume:1 ; number:1 ; day:16 ; month:3 ; year:2017 ; pages:1-10 ; date:12.2017
Diagnostic and prognostic research ; 1, Heft 1 (16.3.2017), 1-10, 12.2017
- Schlagwort
-
Krebs
Onkologie
- Urheber
-
Matino, Davide
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
-
Chai-Adisaksopha, Chatree
Iorio, Alfonso
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s41512-017-0008-z
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-201704022549
- Rechteinformation
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
14.08.2025, 10:44 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Matino, Davide
- Chai-Adisaksopha, Chatree
- Iorio, Alfonso
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Appraisal of umbrella reviews on vaccines
Systematic reviews and meta-analysis published in indexed Portuguese medical journals: time trends and critical appraisal
A survey of prevalence of narrative and systematic reviews in five major medical journals
AMSTAR 2 appraisal of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the field of heart failure from high-impact journals
Appraisal of systematic reviews on interventions for postpartum depression: systematic review
A theoretical and experimental appraisal of five risk elicitation methods
A theoretical and experimental appraisal of five risk elicitation methods
A theoretical and experimental appraisal of five risk elicitation methods
Meta-narrative and realist reviews: guidance, rules, publication standards and quality appraisal
Biophysical reviews top five: atomic force microscopy in biophysics
Quality of reporting of systematic reviews published in “evidence-based” Chinese journals
Scientific value of systematic reviews: survey of editors of core clinical journals
Appraisal of umbrella reviews on vaccines
Systematic reviews and meta-analysis published in indexed Portuguese medical journals: time trends and critical appraisal
A survey of prevalence of narrative and systematic reviews in five major medical journals
AMSTAR 2 appraisal of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the field of heart failure from high-impact journals
Appraisal of systematic reviews on interventions for postpartum depression: systematic review
A theoretical and experimental appraisal of five risk elicitation methods
A theoretical and experimental appraisal of five risk elicitation methods
A theoretical and experimental appraisal of five risk elicitation methods
Meta-narrative and realist reviews: guidance, rules, publication standards and quality appraisal
Biophysical reviews top five: atomic force microscopy in biophysics
Quality of reporting of systematic reviews published in “evidence-based” Chinese journals
Scientific value of systematic reviews: survey of editors of core clinical journals
Appraisal of umbrella reviews on vaccines
Systematic reviews and meta-analysis published in indexed Portuguese medical journals: time trends and critical appraisal
A survey of prevalence of narrative and systematic reviews in five major medical journals
AMSTAR 2 appraisal of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the field of heart failure from high-impact journals
Appraisal of systematic reviews on interventions for postpartum depression: systematic review
A theoretical and experimental appraisal of five risk elicitation methods
A theoretical and experimental appraisal of five risk elicitation methods
A theoretical and experimental appraisal of five risk elicitation methods
Meta-narrative and realist reviews: guidance, rules, publication standards and quality appraisal
Biophysical reviews top five: atomic force microscopy in biophysics
Quality of reporting of systematic reviews published in “evidence-based” Chinese journals